2011•Journal of Clinical and Experimental DentistryOpen access

Non-surgical management of chronic periodontitis with two local drug delivery agents-A comparative study

JS. Gill, Vishal Bharti, Himani Swatantrakumar Gupta, Steven Gill

Open full text 10 citations

Abstract

Background: The selective removal or inhibition of pathogenic microbes with locally delivered antimicrobials when combined with scaling and root planing is often an effective approach for the managment of chronic periodontitis.Aim: To compare the clinical efficacy of tetracycline fibers and a xanthan based chlorhexidine gel in the treatment of chronic periodontitis.Methods and materials: Thirty systemically healthy patients in the age group of 30-50 years suffering from generalized chronic moderate periodontitis were selected.For each subject, two experimental sites were chosen that had probing depth >5mm and were located in symmetric quadrants and the sites were randomized at split mouth level with one receiving tetracycline fibers and the other chlorhexidine gel.Plaque score, bleeding score, probing pocket depth and relative attachment level gain was recorded on day 0 and at the end of 3 months.Results and conclusion: In both groups, there was statistically highly significant reduction in all the clinical parameters i.e. plaque score, bleeding score and probing pocket depth and relative attachment level gain was seen at different time intervals.Local delivery of tetracycline and chlorhexidine is a safe, easy and efficacious method along with scaling and root planing in the treatment of chronic periodontitis.Inter-comparison of both local drug delivery agents with respect to clinical changes shows that tetracycline fibers are better than chlorhexidine gel for treatment of chronic periodontitis.Nevertheless, long term studies with more samples are suggested to further evaluate and compare the efficacy of both materials.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: The selective removal or inhibition of pathogenic microbes with locally delivered antimicrobials when combined with scaling and root planing is often an effective approach for the managment of chronic periodontitis.Aim: To compare the clinical efficacy of tetracycline fibers and a xanthan based chlorhexidine gel in the treatment of chronic periodontitis.Methods and materials: Thirty systemically healthy patients in the age group of 30-50 years suffering from generalized chronic moderate periodontitis were selected.For each subject, two experimental sites were chosen that had probing depth >5mm and were located in symmetric quadrants and the sites were randomized at split mouth level with one receiving tetracycline fibers and the other chlorhexidine gel.Plaque score, bleeding score, probing pocket depth and relative attachment level gain was recorded on day 0 and at the end of 3 months.Results and conclusion: In both groups, there was statistically highly significant reduction in all the clinical parameters i.e. plaque score, bleeding score and probing pocket depth and relative attachment level gain was seen at different time intervals.Local delivery of tetracycline and chlorhexidine is a safe, easy and efficacious method along with scaling and root planing in the treatment of chronic periodontitis.Inter-comparison of both local drug delivery agents with respect to clinical changes shows that tetracycline fibers are better than chlorhexidine gel for treatment of chronic periodontitis.Nevertheless, long term studies with more samples are suggested to further evaluate and compare the efficacy of both materials.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: The selective removal or inhibition of pathogenic microbes with locally delivered antimicrobials when combined with scaling and root planing is often an effective approach for the managment of chronic periodontitis.Aim: To compare the clinical efficacy of tetracycline fibers and a xanthan based chlorhexidine gel in the treatment of chronic periodontitis.Methods and materials: Thirty systemically healthy patients in the age group of 30-50 years suffering from generalized chronic moderate periodontitis were selected.For each subject, two experimental sites were chosen that had probing depth >5mm and were located in symmetric quadrants and the sites were randomized at split mouth level with one receiving tetracycline fibers and the other chlorhexidine gel.Plaque score, bleeding score, probing pocket depth and relative attachment level gain was recorded on day 0 and at the end of 3 months.Results and conclusion: In both groups, there was statistically highly significant reduction in all the clinical parameters i.e. plaque score, bleeding score and probing pocket depth and relative attachment level gain was seen at different time intervals.Local delivery of tetracycline and chlorhexidine is a safe, easy and efficacious method along with scaling and root planing in the treatment of chronic periodontitis.Inter-comparison of both local drug delivery agents with respect to clinical changes shows that tetracycline fibers are better than chlorhexidine gel for treatment of chronic periodontitis.Nevertheless, long term studies with more samples are suggested to further evaluate and compare the efficacy of both materials.

Key concepts: Chronic periodontitis, Medicine, Periodontitis, Drug delivery, Dentistry, Intensive care medicine, Nanotechnology, Materials science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Non-surgical management of chronic periodontitis with two local drug delivery agents-A comparative study — Research Paper | ScholarLens