2004•Aesthetic Surgery JournalRequires access

Surgical correction of the “small” postpartum ptotic breast

M VELASCO, Pablo Arizti, R TOCA

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In our experience, most women seeking correction of the "small" ptotic breast have a history of previous pregnancies and breastfeeding. OBJECTIVE: We propose a classification of postpartum ptosis into 4 groups and describe the appropriate surgical treatment for each category of ptosis. METHODS: We defined categories of ptosis on the basis of the remnant mammary gland, skin condition, position of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC), and distance from the NAC to the inframammary fold (IMF). Patients in group 1 (n = 15), with the NAC in good position, were treated with the use of simple subglandular augmentation mammaplasty. Patients in group 2 (n = 8), with grade I ptosis in which the nipple required elevation of no more than 3 cm and the distance from the inferior border of the areola to the IMF was less than 4 cm, were treated with the use of crescent-moon mastopexy. Patients in group 3 (n = 20), who demonstrated a higher degree of skin flaccidity and grade I or II ptosis and in whom the distance from the NAC inferior border to the IMF was between 4 and 6 cm, were treated with the use of circumareolar mastopexy. Patients in group 4 (n = 24), with moderate to severe skin flaccidity and ptosis in whom the distance from the NAC to the IMF was more than 4 cm, were treated with the use of modified vertical mastopexy. RESULTS: Eight-five percent of patients were satisfied with their results. Unfavorable results were related to dissatisfaction with breast shape and postoperative scarring; such results occurred most often in group 4 patients. Complications were within reasonable limits, including 2 cases of hematoma and 3 cases of decreased NAC sensibility in group 3 patients and minor dehiscence in 3 patients in group 4. CONCLUSIONS: Careful patient evaluation and choice of technique, as determined by the classification proposed in this paper, enabled us to achieve high rates of patient satisfaction with low rates of complications and revision.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: In our experience, most women seeking correction of the "small" ptotic breast have a history of previous pregnancies and breastfeeding. OBJECTIVE: We propose a classification of postpartum ptosis into 4 groups and describe the appropriate surgical treatment for each category of ptosis. METHODS: We defined categories of ptosis on the basis of the remnant mammary gland, skin condition, position of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC), and distance from the NAC to the inframammary fold (IMF). Patients in group 1 (n = 15), with the NAC in good position, were treated with the use of simple subglandular augmentation mammaplasty. Patients in group 2 (n = 8), with grade I ptosis in which the nipple required elevation of no more than 3 cm and the distance from the inferior border of the areola to the IMF was less than 4 cm, were treated with the use of crescent-moon mastopexy. Patients in group 3 (n = 20), who demonstrated a higher degree of skin flaccidity and grade I or II ptosis and in whom the distance from the NAC inferior border to the IMF was between 4 and 6 cm, were treated with the use of circumareolar mastopexy. Patients in group 4 (n = 24), with moderate to severe skin flaccidity and ptosis in whom the distance from the NAC to the IMF was more than 4 cm, were treated with the use of modified vertical mastopexy. RESULTS: Eight-five percent of patients were satisfied with their results. Unfavorable results were related to dissatisfaction with breast shape and postoperative scarring; such results occurred most often in group 4 patients. Complications were within reasonable limits, including 2 cases of hematoma and 3 cases of decreased NAC sensibility in group 3 patients and minor dehiscence in 3 patients in group 4. CONCLUSIONS: Careful patient evaluation and choice of technique, as determined by the classification proposed in this paper, enabled us to achieve high rates of patient satisfaction with low rates of complications and revision.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: In our experience, most women seeking correction of the "small" ptotic breast have a history of previous pregnancies and breastfeeding. OBJECTIVE: We propose a classification of postpartum ptosis into 4 groups and describe the appropriate surgical treatment for each category of ptosis. METHODS: We defined categories of ptosis on the basis of the remnant mammary gland, skin condition, position of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC), and distance from the NAC to the inframammary fold (IMF). Patients in group 1 (n = 15), with the NAC in good position, were treated with the use of simple subglandular augmentation mammaplasty. Patients in group 2 (n = 8), with grade I ptosis in which the nipple required elevation of no more than 3 cm and the distance from the inferior border of the areola to the IMF was less than 4 cm, were treated with the use of crescent-moon mastopexy. Patients in group 3 (n = 20), who demonstrated a higher degree of skin flaccidity and grade I or II ptosis and in whom the distance from the NAC inferior border to the IMF was between 4 and 6 cm, were treated with the use of circumareolar mastopexy. Patients in group 4 (n = 24), with moderate to severe skin flaccidity and ptosis in whom the distance from the NAC to the IMF was more than 4 cm, were treated with the use of modified vertical mastopexy. RESULTS: Eight-five percent of patients were satisfied with their results. Unfavorable results were related to dissatisfaction with breast shape and postoperative scarring; such results occurred most often in group 4 patients. Complications were within reasonable limits, including 2 cases of hematoma and 3 cases of decreased NAC sensibility in group 3 patients and minor dehiscence in 3 patients in group 4. CONCLUSIONS: Careful patient evaluation and choice of technique, as determined by the classification proposed in this paper, enabled us to achieve high rates of patient satisfaction with low rates of complications and revision.

Key concepts: Ptosis, Medicine, Mastopexy, Inframammary fold, Surgery, Areola, Mammaplasty, Breast augmentation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Surgical correction of the “small” postpartum ptotic breast — Research Paper | ScholarLens