2007•Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)Requires access

Caracterización y ética en el género documental

Carl Plantinga

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

In this essay I draw a sharp distinction between fiction and nonfiction, arguing that one of the hallmarks of the documentary is that since documentaries represent actual people, the filmmaker has ethical obligations toward the people he represents that do not exist for the representation of fictional characters. Though the documentary represents actual persons, it nonetheless characterizes them rather than presenting them transparently as they really are. In this essay I first define the documentary as what I call “asserted veridical representation.” Then I go on to explore the various means by which filmmakers characterize persons in films, and the ethical implications of such characterizations. One of the chief ethnical obligations of the documentary filmmaker, I argue, is to show the truth insofar as this is possible, although the obligation of truth-telling can sometimes be superceded by the requirement of charity toward the film’s subjects.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this essay I draw a sharp distinction between fiction and nonfiction, arguing that one of the hallmarks of the documentary is that since documentaries represent actual people, the filmmaker has ethical obligations toward the people he represents that do not exist for the representation of fictional characters. Though the documentary represents actual persons, it nonetheless characterizes them rather than presenting them transparently as they really are. In this essay I first define the documentary as what I call “asserted veridical representation.” Then I go on to explore the various means by which filmmakers characterize persons in films, and the ethical implications of such characterizations. One of the chief ethnical obligations of the documentary filmmaker, I argue, is to show the truth insofar as this is possible, although the obligation of truth-telling can sometimes be superceded by the requirement of charity toward the film’s subjects.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this essay I draw a sharp distinction between fiction and nonfiction, arguing that one of the hallmarks of the documentary is that since documentaries represent actual people, the filmmaker has ethical obligations toward the people he represents that do not exist for the representation of fictional characters. Though the documentary represents actual persons, it nonetheless characterizes them rather than presenting them transparently as they really are. In this essay I first define the documentary as what I call “asserted veridical representation.” Then I go on to explore the various means by which filmmakers characterize persons in films, and the ethical implications of such characterizations. One of the chief ethnical obligations of the documentary filmmaker, I argue, is to show the truth insofar as this is possible, although the obligation of truth-telling can sometimes be superceded by the requirement of charity toward the film’s subjects.

Key concepts: Film director, Documentary film, Representation (politics), Obligation, Art, Aesthetics, Literature, Movie theater

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Caracterización y ética en el género documental — Research Paper | ScholarLens