2003•Unpublished venueRequires access

A study on comparison between VBR and CBR video service in ATM environment

Takashi Tanaka, Sakae Okubo, H Hashimoto, Hiroshi Yasuda

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

The authors compare constant bit rate (CBR) and variable bit rate (VBR) video services in an asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) environment. The simplified network model of CCITT SGXV is used to estimate the statistical multiplexing gain for VBR service. Current NNI (network node interface) capacities, 150 or 600 Mb/s, are determined to be too small to effectively support standard television signals that are VBR coded at average bit rates of 5-10 Mb/s. It is also shown that the leaky bucket technique is superior to the sliding window technique for an average bit rate usage parameter control from the service point of view. If sliding window is used, higher picture quality and shorter delay are not always guaranteed in VBR video services.>

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The authors compare constant bit rate (CBR) and variable bit rate (VBR) video services in an asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) environment. The simplified network model of CCITT SGXV is used to estimate the statistical multiplexing gain for VBR service. Current NNI (network node interface) capacities, 150 or 600 Mb/s, are determined to be too small to effectively support standard television signals that are VBR coded at average bit rates of 5-10 Mb/s. It is also shown that the leaky bucket technique is superior to the sliding window technique for an average bit rate usage parameter control from the service point of view. If sliding window is used, higher picture quality and shorter delay are not always guaranteed in VBR video services.>

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The authors compare constant bit rate (CBR) and variable bit rate (VBR) video services in an asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) environment. The simplified network model of CCITT SGXV is used to estimate the statistical multiplexing gain for VBR service. Current NNI (network node interface) capacities, 150 or 600 Mb/s, are determined to be too small to effectively support standard television signals that are VBR coded at average bit rates of 5-10 Mb/s. It is also shown that the leaky bucket technique is superior to the sliding window technique for an average bit rate usage parameter control from the service point of view. If sliding window is used, higher picture quality and shorter delay are not always guaranteed in VBR video services.>

Key concepts: Variable bitrate, Constant bitrate, Asynchronous Transfer Mode, Computer science, Sliding window protocol, Quality of service, Computer network, Asynchronous communication

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A study on comparison between VBR and CBR video service in ATM environment — Research Paper | ScholarLens