2003•Unpublished venueRequires access

A comparative study of extensible routers

Yitzchak M. Gottlieb, Larry Peterson

Open publisher page 37 citations

Abstract

Motivated by the demand for routers with new capabilities, researchers have been building extensible routers that aid in the design and development of network protocols and services. This paper evaluates and compares three such systems: (1) Princeton's Scout-based Extensible Router, (2) MIT's Click router, and (3) Washington University's Router Plugins. To provide a framework in which these three systems can be studied, the paper also presents a simple model of an extensible router based on four primitive objects: queues, classifiers, forwarders, and schedulers. By composing these primitive objects it is possible to model everything from a standard, best-effort IP router to an application-level proxy. The paper also briefly discusses the role that extensible routers play in the construction of active, programmable, and overlay networks.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Motivated by the demand for routers with new capabilities, researchers have been building extensible routers that aid in the design and development of network protocols and services. This paper evaluates and compares three such systems: (1) Princeton's Scout-based Extensible Router, (2) MIT's Click router, and (3) Washington University's Router Plugins. To provide a framework in which these three systems can be studied, the paper also presents a simple model of an extensible router based on four primitive objects: queues, classifiers, forwarders, and schedulers. By composing these primitive objects it is possible to model everything from a standard, best-effort IP router to an application-level proxy. The paper also briefly discusses the role that extensible routers play in the construction of active, programmable, and overlay networks.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 37 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Motivated by the demand for routers with new capabilities, researchers have been building extensible routers that aid in the design and development of network protocols and services. This paper evaluates and compares three such systems: (1) Princeton's Scout-based Extensible Router, (2) MIT's Click router, and (3) Washington University's Router Plugins. To provide a framework in which these three systems can be studied, the paper also presents a simple model of an extensible router based on four primitive objects: queues, classifiers, forwarders, and schedulers. By composing these primitive objects it is possible to model everything from a standard, best-effort IP router to an application-level proxy. The paper also briefly discusses the role that extensible routers play in the construction of active, programmable, and overlay networks.

Key concepts: Router, Computer science, One-armed router, Extensibility, Core router, Computer network, Overlay network, Plug-in

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparative study of extensible routers — Research Paper | ScholarLens