1991Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University)Requires access

Duality in Korean Morphology

Ki Joong Song

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

It is well known that some 60 percent of the entries found in any dictionary of the Korean language are Han-Ja-eo 漢字語("words of Chinese Characters") in Korean, or Sino-Korean in English, as they have been named by western scholars. In the dictionaries the Sino-Korean (henceforth "SK") entries are usually accompaned by Chinese characters by which they are easily distinguished from those of Non-Sino-Korean (henceforth "NSK"), which include Native Korean and borrowings from other languages in the historical periods as well as modern times. \n\nSK is obviously a major constituent of the Korean language. However, it has been rarely mentioned, or, rather, has been avoided to mention as much as possible, in the grammars of Korean. The reaseon seems to quite simple. That is, a number of features of SK are difficult to describe systematically in the same terms defined for those of NSK. For this reason the grammarians have preferred to confine themselves to NSK, while largely ignoreing SK.\n\nAlthough an SK form and an NSK form may be semantically compared each other, their morphological functions are fundamentally different. Accordingly, it can be properly argues that there are two distinctive sub-systems at work in the morphological parts of the Korean grammar one for NSK and another for SK. In the present study some of the outstanding differences between the two are to be discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It is well known that some 60 percent of the entries found in any dictionary of the Korean language are Han-Ja-eo 漢字語("words of Chinese Characters") in Korean, or Sino-Korean in English, as they have been named by western scholars. In the dictionaries the Sino-Korean (henceforth "SK") entries are usually accompaned by Chinese characters by which they are easily distinguished from those of Non-Sino-Korean (henceforth "NSK"), which include Native Korean and borrowings from other languages in the historical periods as well as modern times. \n\nSK is obviously a major constituent of the Korean language. However, it has been rarely mentioned, or, rather, has been avoided to mention as much as possible, in the grammars of Korean. The reaseon seems to quite simple. That is, a number of features of SK are difficult to describe systematically in the same terms defined for those of NSK. For this reason the grammarians have preferred to confine themselves to NSK, while largely ignoreing SK.\n\nAlthough an SK form and an NSK form may be semantically compared each other, their morphological functions are fundamentally different. Accordingly, it can be properly argues that there are two distinctive sub-systems at work in the morphological parts of the Korean grammar one for NSK and another for SK. In the present study some of the outstanding differences between the two are to be discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It is well known that some 60 percent of the entries found in any dictionary of the Korean language are Han-Ja-eo 漢字語("words of Chinese Characters") in Korean, or Sino-Korean in English, as they have been named by western scholars. In the dictionaries the Sino-Korean (henceforth "SK") entries are usually accompaned by Chinese characters by which they are easily distinguished from those of Non-Sino-Korean (henceforth "NSK"), which include Native Korean and borrowings from other languages in the historical periods as well as modern times. \n\nSK is obviously a major constituent of the Korean language. However, it has been rarely mentioned, or, rather, has been avoided to mention as much as possible, in the grammars of Korean. The reaseon seems to quite simple. That is, a number of features of SK are difficult to describe systematically in the same terms defined for those of NSK. For this reason the grammarians have preferred to confine themselves to NSK, while largely ignoreing SK.\n\nAlthough an SK form and an NSK form may be semantically compared each other, their morphological functions are fundamentally different. Accordingly, it can be properly argues that there are two distinctive sub-systems at work in the morphological parts of the Korean grammar one for NSK and another for SK. In the present study some of the outstanding differences between the two are to be discussed.

Key concepts: Morphology (biology), Duality (order theory), Korean studies, History, Linguistics, Gerontology, Demography, Gender studies

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Duality in Korean Morphology — Research Paper | ScholarLens