2008Unpublished venueRequires access

Multiple-implementation testing for XACML implementations

Nuo Li, JeeHyun Hwang, Tao Xie

Open publisher page 27 citations

Abstract

Many Web applications enhance their security via access-control systems. XACML is a standardized policy language, which has been widely used in access-control systems. In an XACML-based access-control system, policies, requests, and responses are written in XACML. An XACML implementation implements XACML functionalities to validate XACML requests against XACML policies. To ensure the quality of an XACML-based access-control system, we need an effective means to test whether the XACML implementation correctly implements XACML functionalities. The test inputs of an XACML implementation are XACML policies and requests. The test outputs are XACML responses. This paper proposes an approach to detect defects in XACML implementations via observing the behaviors of different XACML implementations for the same test inputs. As XACML has been widely used, we can collect different XACML implementations, and test them with the same XACML polices and requests to observe whether the different implementations produce different responses. Based on the analysis of different responses, we can detect defects in different XACML implementations. We show the feasibility of the proposed approach with a preliminary study on three XACML implementations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Many Web applications enhance their security via access-control systems. XACML is a standardized policy language, which has been widely used in access-control systems. In an XACML-based access-control system, policies, requests, and responses are written in XACML. An XACML implementation implements XACML functionalities to validate XACML requests against XACML policies. To ensure the quality of an XACML-based access-control system, we need an effective means to test whether the XACML implementation correctly implements XACML functionalities. The test inputs of an XACML implementation are XACML policies and requests. The test outputs are XACML responses. This paper proposes an approach to detect defects in XACML implementations via observing the behaviors of different XACML implementations for the same test inputs. As XACML has been widely used, we can collect different XACML implementations, and test them with the same XACML polices and requests to observe whether the different implementations produce different responses. Based on the analysis of different responses, we can detect defects in different XACML implementations. We show the feasibility of the proposed approach with a preliminary study on three XACML implementations.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 27 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Many Web applications enhance their security via access-control systems. XACML is a standardized policy language, which has been widely used in access-control systems. In an XACML-based access-control system, policies, requests, and responses are written in XACML. An XACML implementation implements XACML functionalities to validate XACML requests against XACML policies. To ensure the quality of an XACML-based access-control system, we need an effective means to test whether the XACML implementation correctly implements XACML functionalities. The test inputs of an XACML implementation are XACML policies and requests. The test outputs are XACML responses. This paper proposes an approach to detect defects in XACML implementations via observing the behaviors of different XACML implementations for the same test inputs. As XACML has been widely used, we can collect different XACML implementations, and test them with the same XACML polices and requests to observe whether the different implementations produce different responses. Based on the analysis of different responses, we can detect defects in different XACML implementations. We show the feasibility of the proposed approach with a preliminary study on three XACML implementations.

Key concepts: XACML, Implementation, Computer science, Access control, Markup language, Database, Programming language, XML

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Multiple-implementation testing for XACML implementations — Research Paper | ScholarLens