Global Justice between Minimalism and Egalitarianism
Chris Armstrong
Abstract
Chris Armstrong
Abstract
Many of the most important recent debates on global distributive justice take place between defenders of global egalitarian positions, on the one hand, and defenders of more sufficientarian or 'minimalist' positions on the other. This paper reviews two recent contributions to those debates, from Pablo Gilabert (in his book From Global Poverty to Global Equality) and Mathias Risse (in his book On Global Justice). It offers an account of their respective strengths, and seeks to situate their arguments within the on-going debate between egalitarianism and minimalism at the global level.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Many of the most important recent debates on global distributive justice take place between defenders of global egalitarian positions, on the one hand, and defenders of more sufficientarian or 'minimalist' positions on the other. This paper reviews two recent contributions to those debates, from Pablo Gilabert (in his book From Global Poverty to Global Equality) and Mathias Risse (in his book On Global Justice). It offers an account of their respective strengths, and seeks to situate their arguments within the on-going debate between egalitarianism and minimalism at the global level.
Key concepts: Minimalism (technical communication), Egalitarianism, Global justice, Distributive justice, Economic Justice, Law and economics, Sociology, Poverty