Agency Costs, Risk Management, and Capital Structure
Hayne E. Leland
Abstract
Hayne E. Leland
Abstract
ABSTRACT The joint determination of capital structure and investment risk is examined. Optimal capital structure reflects both the tax advantages of debt less default costs ( Modigliani and Miller (1958, 1963) ), and the agency costs resulting from asset substitution ( Jensen and Meckling (1976) ). Agency costs restrict leverage and debt maturity and increase yield spreads, but their importance is small for the range of environments considered. Risk management is also examined. Hedging permits greater leverage. Even when a firm cannot precommit to hedging, it will still do so. Surprisingly, hedging benefits often are greater when agency costs are low.
OpenAlex reports 1588 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
ABSTRACT The joint determination of capital structure and investment risk is examined. Optimal capital structure reflects both the tax advantages of debt less default costs ( Modigliani and Miller (1958, 1963) ), and the agency costs resulting from asset substitution ( Jensen and Meckling (1976) ). Agency costs restrict leverage and debt maturity and increase yield spreads, but their importance is small for the range of environments considered. Risk management is also examined. Hedging permits greater leverage. Even when a firm cannot precommit to hedging, it will still do so. Surprisingly, hedging benefits often are greater when agency costs are low.
Key concepts: Capital structure, Agency cost, Leverage (statistics), Debt, Cost of capital, Economics, Finance, Business