1999Journal of Plankton ResearchRequires access

Larval development of Balanus reticulatus Utinomi, 1967 (Cirripedia, Thoracica) and a comparison with other barnacle larvae

Caroline Lee

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

Abstract. The morphological features of the cephalic shield, labrum, abdominal process, antennules, antennae and mandibles of Balanus reticulatus are described and illustrated. The size and setation formulae of the larvae are given at each stage. The trilobed labrum and lateral margin of the cephalic shield with numerous small spines are diagnostic features for all the subsequent nauplius stages. Numerous small denticulate processes on the surface of the cyprid carapace are major morphological characteristics not found in other balanomorph species. We have constructed keys from stage II to stage VI for the predominant barnacle nauplii of Korean coastal waters, based on morphological traits such as total length, shield width, labrum shape, the presence or absence of posterior shield spines and dorsal shield spines in stages IV, V and VI, the specific setal type in the fourth segment of the antennal endopodite, and setation formulae of Pollicipes mitella, Chthamalus challengeri, Megabal-

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract. The morphological features of the cephalic shield, labrum, abdominal process, antennules, antennae and mandibles of Balanus reticulatus are described and illustrated. The size and setation formulae of the larvae are given at each stage. The trilobed labrum and lateral margin of the cephalic shield with numerous small spines are diagnostic features for all the subsequent nauplius stages. Numerous small denticulate processes on the surface of the cyprid carapace are major morphological characteristics not found in other balanomorph species. We have constructed keys from stage II to stage VI for the predominant barnacle nauplii of Korean coastal waters, based on morphological traits such as total length, shield width, labrum shape, the presence or absence of posterior shield spines and dorsal shield spines in stages IV, V and VI, the specific setal type in the fourth segment of the antennal endopodite, and setation formulae of Pollicipes mitella, Chthamalus challengeri, Megabal-

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract. The morphological features of the cephalic shield, labrum, abdominal process, antennules, antennae and mandibles of Balanus reticulatus are described and illustrated. The size and setation formulae of the larvae are given at each stage. The trilobed labrum and lateral margin of the cephalic shield with numerous small spines are diagnostic features for all the subsequent nauplius stages. Numerous small denticulate processes on the surface of the cyprid carapace are major morphological characteristics not found in other balanomorph species. We have constructed keys from stage II to stage VI for the predominant barnacle nauplii of Korean coastal waters, based on morphological traits such as total length, shield width, labrum shape, the presence or absence of posterior shield spines and dorsal shield spines in stages IV, V and VI, the specific setal type in the fourth segment of the antennal endopodite, and setation formulae of Pollicipes mitella, Chthamalus challengeri, Megabal-

Key concepts: Thoracica, Barnacle, Balanus, Larva, Biology, Zoology, Crustacean, Ecology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Larval development of Balanus reticulatus Utinomi, 1967 (Cirripedia, Thoracica) and a comparison with other barnacle larvae — Research Paper | ScholarLens