1990•Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution)Open access

Growth response in a Douglas-fir/lodgepole pine stand after thinning of lodgepole pine by the mountain pine beetle: A case study

Richard A. Heath, René I. Alfaro

Open full text 59 citations

Abstract

Diameter growth response was measured in a mixed stand of lodgepole pine, Pinus contorta Doug].ex Loud, and interior Douglas-fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii var glauca (Beissn.)Franco, in the Cariboo Forest Region of British Columbia, 14 years after an outbreak of the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins, killed 76% of the pine.Nearly ali Douglas-fir and a large proportion of the lodgepole pine responded to the beetle-induced thinning with a diameter growth increase which persisted 14 years after the infestation.Douglas-fir trees gained an average 1.4 cm or 11.7% in diameter over the estimated size the trees would have reached in the absence of the thinning effect.Annual growth rates of Douglas-fir in the post-outbreak period averaged 2% per year without the beetle-induced thinning and 2.9% after thinning.The surviving lodgepole pine trees gained an average | cm or 5.4% in diameter over the size the trees would have reached in the absence of the thinning effect.In the post-outbreak period, annual diameter growth rates of the pine doubled from 0.4% per year without the thinning, to 0.8% per year with thinning.The thinning response in Douglas-fir was inversely related to the initial diameter and age of the trees at the start of the infestation but that of pine was not.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Diameter growth response was measured in a mixed stand of lodgepole pine, Pinus contorta Doug].ex Loud, and interior Douglas-fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii var glauca (Beissn.)Franco, in the Cariboo Forest Region of British Columbia, 14 years after an outbreak of the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins, killed 76% of the pine.Nearly ali Douglas-fir and a large proportion of the lodgepole pine responded to the beetle-induced thinning with a diameter growth increase which persisted 14 years after the infestation.Douglas-fir trees gained an average 1.4 cm or 11.7% in diameter over the estimated size the trees would have reached in the absence of the thinning effect.Annual growth rates of Douglas-fir in the post-outbreak period averaged 2% per year without the beetle-induced thinning and 2.9% after thinning.The surviving lodgepole pine trees gained an average | cm or 5.4% in diameter over the size the trees would have reached in the absence of the thinning effect.In the post-outbreak period, annual diameter growth rates of the pine doubled from 0.4% per year without the thinning, to 0.8% per year with thinning.The thinning response in Douglas-fir was inversely related to the initial diameter and age of the trees at the start of the infestation but that of pine was not.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 59 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Diameter growth response was measured in a mixed stand of lodgepole pine, Pinus contorta Doug].ex Loud, and interior Douglas-fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii var glauca (Beissn.)Franco, in the Cariboo Forest Region of British Columbia, 14 years after an outbreak of the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins, killed 76% of the pine.Nearly ali Douglas-fir and a large proportion of the lodgepole pine responded to the beetle-induced thinning with a diameter growth increase which persisted 14 years after the infestation.Douglas-fir trees gained an average 1.4 cm or 11.7% in diameter over the estimated size the trees would have reached in the absence of the thinning effect.Annual growth rates of Douglas-fir in the post-outbreak period averaged 2% per year without the beetle-induced thinning and 2.9% after thinning.The surviving lodgepole pine trees gained an average | cm or 5.4% in diameter over the size the trees would have reached in the absence of the thinning effect.In the post-outbreak period, annual diameter growth rates of the pine doubled from 0.4% per year without the thinning, to 0.8% per year with thinning.The thinning response in Douglas-fir was inversely related to the initial diameter and age of the trees at the start of the infestation but that of pine was not.

Key concepts: Thinning, Pinus contorta, Mountain pine beetle, Douglas fir, Infestation, Dendroctonus, Forestry, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Growth response in a Douglas-fir/lodgepole pine stand after thinning of lodgepole pine by the mountain pine beetle: A case study — Research Paper | ScholarLens