Antileishmanial activity of nano-amphotericin B deoxycholate
Krishna Das Manandhar, Thakur Prasad Yadav, Vijay Kumar Prajapati, Subodh Kumar, Madhukar Rai, Anuradha Dube, Onkar Nath Srivastava, S. Sundar
Abstract
Open-access reader
Krishna Das Manandhar, Thakur Prasad Yadav, Vijay Kumar Prajapati, Subodh Kumar, Madhukar Rai, Anuradha Dube, Onkar Nath Srivastava, S. Sundar
Abstract
Open-access reader
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of a nano form of amphotericin B deoxycholate with that of conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate for the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis. METHODS: We have formulated nanoparticles (10-20 nM) from amphotericin B deoxycholate (1-2 microM) by applying high-pressure (150 argon) milling homogenization and have tested their efficacy in a J774A cell line and in hamsters. Parasite survival and tissue burden in spleen were evaluated for nano-amphotericin B and conventional amphotericin B. Both nano-amphotericin B and conventional amphotericin B were injected intraperitoneally at 5 mg/kg per day for 5 days. RESULTS: The inhibition of amastigotes in the splenic tissue with nano-amphotericin B was significantly more than with conventional amphotericin B (92.18% versus 74.57%, P = 0.005). Similarly, the suppression of parasite replication in the spleen was also found to be significant (99.18% versus 97.17%, P = 0.05). In a cytotoxicity test, nano-amphotericin B against the J774A cell line had a CC(50) of 12.67 mg/L in comparison with 10.61 mg/L for amphotericin B, far higher than the doses used for ED(50). CONCLUSIONS: Nanoparticles of amphotericin B had significantly greater efficacy than conventional amphotericin B. This formulation may have a favourable safety profile, and if production costs are low, it may prove to be a feasible alternative to conventional amphotericin B.
OpenAlex reports 78 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of a nano form of amphotericin B deoxycholate with that of conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate for the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis. METHODS: We have formulated nanoparticles (10-20 nM) from amphotericin B deoxycholate (1-2 microM) by applying high-pressure (150 argon) milling homogenization and have tested their efficacy in a J774A cell line and in hamsters. Parasite survival and tissue burden in spleen were evaluated for nano-amphotericin B and conventional amphotericin B. Both nano-amphotericin B and conventional amphotericin B were injected intraperitoneally at 5 mg/kg per day for 5 days. RESULTS: The inhibition of amastigotes in the splenic tissue with nano-amphotericin B was significantly more than with conventional amphotericin B (92.18% versus 74.57%, P = 0.005). Similarly, the suppression of parasite replication in the spleen was also found to be significant (99.18% versus 97.17%, P = 0.05). In a cytotoxicity test, nano-amphotericin B against the J774A cell line had a CC(50) of 12.67 mg/L in comparison with 10.61 mg/L for amphotericin B, far higher than the doses used for ED(50). CONCLUSIONS: Nanoparticles of amphotericin B had significantly greater efficacy than conventional amphotericin B. This formulation may have a favourable safety profile, and if production costs are low, it may prove to be a feasible alternative to conventional amphotericin B.
Key concepts: Amphotericin B, Amphotericin B deoxycholate, Pharmacology, Visceral leishmaniasis, Cytotoxicity, Spleen, Medicine, Chemistry