2008•Journal of Antimicrobial ChemotherapyOpen access

Antileishmanial activity of nano-amphotericin B deoxycholate

Krishna Das Manandhar, Thakur Prasad Yadav, Vijay Kumar Prajapati, Subodh Kumar, Madhukar Rai, Anuradha Dube, Onkar Nath Srivastava, S. Sundar

Open full text 78 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of a nano form of amphotericin B deoxycholate with that of conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate for the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis. METHODS: We have formulated nanoparticles (10-20 nM) from amphotericin B deoxycholate (1-2 microM) by applying high-pressure (150 argon) milling homogenization and have tested their efficacy in a J774A cell line and in hamsters. Parasite survival and tissue burden in spleen were evaluated for nano-amphotericin B and conventional amphotericin B. Both nano-amphotericin B and conventional amphotericin B were injected intraperitoneally at 5 mg/kg per day for 5 days. RESULTS: The inhibition of amastigotes in the splenic tissue with nano-amphotericin B was significantly more than with conventional amphotericin B (92.18% versus 74.57%, P = 0.005). Similarly, the suppression of parasite replication in the spleen was also found to be significant (99.18% versus 97.17%, P = 0.05). In a cytotoxicity test, nano-amphotericin B against the J774A cell line had a CC(50) of 12.67 mg/L in comparison with 10.61 mg/L for amphotericin B, far higher than the doses used for ED(50). CONCLUSIONS: Nanoparticles of amphotericin B had significantly greater efficacy than conventional amphotericin B. This formulation may have a favourable safety profile, and if production costs are low, it may prove to be a feasible alternative to conventional amphotericin B.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of a nano form of amphotericin B deoxycholate with that of conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate for the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis. METHODS: We have formulated nanoparticles (10-20 nM) from amphotericin B deoxycholate (1-2 microM) by applying high-pressure (150 argon) milling homogenization and have tested their efficacy in a J774A cell line and in hamsters. Parasite survival and tissue burden in spleen were evaluated for nano-amphotericin B and conventional amphotericin B. Both nano-amphotericin B and conventional amphotericin B were injected intraperitoneally at 5 mg/kg per day for 5 days. RESULTS: The inhibition of amastigotes in the splenic tissue with nano-amphotericin B was significantly more than with conventional amphotericin B (92.18% versus 74.57%, P = 0.005). Similarly, the suppression of parasite replication in the spleen was also found to be significant (99.18% versus 97.17%, P = 0.05). In a cytotoxicity test, nano-amphotericin B against the J774A cell line had a CC(50) of 12.67 mg/L in comparison with 10.61 mg/L for amphotericin B, far higher than the doses used for ED(50). CONCLUSIONS: Nanoparticles of amphotericin B had significantly greater efficacy than conventional amphotericin B. This formulation may have a favourable safety profile, and if production costs are low, it may prove to be a feasible alternative to conventional amphotericin B.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 78 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of a nano form of amphotericin B deoxycholate with that of conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate for the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis. METHODS: We have formulated nanoparticles (10-20 nM) from amphotericin B deoxycholate (1-2 microM) by applying high-pressure (150 argon) milling homogenization and have tested their efficacy in a J774A cell line and in hamsters. Parasite survival and tissue burden in spleen were evaluated for nano-amphotericin B and conventional amphotericin B. Both nano-amphotericin B and conventional amphotericin B were injected intraperitoneally at 5 mg/kg per day for 5 days. RESULTS: The inhibition of amastigotes in the splenic tissue with nano-amphotericin B was significantly more than with conventional amphotericin B (92.18% versus 74.57%, P = 0.005). Similarly, the suppression of parasite replication in the spleen was also found to be significant (99.18% versus 97.17%, P = 0.05). In a cytotoxicity test, nano-amphotericin B against the J774A cell line had a CC(50) of 12.67 mg/L in comparison with 10.61 mg/L for amphotericin B, far higher than the doses used for ED(50). CONCLUSIONS: Nanoparticles of amphotericin B had significantly greater efficacy than conventional amphotericin B. This formulation may have a favourable safety profile, and if production costs are low, it may prove to be a feasible alternative to conventional amphotericin B.

Key concepts: Amphotericin B, Amphotericin B deoxycholate, Pharmacology, Visceral leishmaniasis, Cytotoxicity, Spleen, Medicine, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Antileishmanial activity of nano-amphotericin B deoxycholate — Research Paper | ScholarLens