Reengineering the performance appraisal
Henry Findley, Gordon M. Amsler, Earl E. Ingram
Abstract
Henry Findley, Gordon M. Amsler, Earl E. Ingram
Abstract
Abstract Supporters of total quality management often argue that the performance appraisal should no longer be used because it inhibits cooperative behavior. Others contend that the appraisal is too hard to implement. This article shows, however, that there are important reasons for retaining the appraisal as a key instrument in managing employee performance. Rather than dismantling their performance assessment systems, most organizations would do well to revamp them to ensure accuracy and fairness. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract Supporters of total quality management often argue that the performance appraisal should no longer be used because it inhibits cooperative behavior. Others contend that the appraisal is too hard to implement. This article shows, however, that there are important reasons for retaining the appraisal as a key instrument in managing employee performance. Rather than dismantling their performance assessment systems, most organizations would do well to revamp them to ensure accuracy and fairness. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Key concepts: Performance appraisal, Business process reengineering, Key (lock), Process management, Quality (philosophy), Project appraisal, Employee Performance Appraisal, Critical appraisal