1995Journal of Clinical MicrobiologyOpen access

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from women by ligase chain reaction

Mansour Bassiri, Hsiang-Yun Hu, М Домейка, John D. Burczak, L Svensson, H H Lee, P.‐A. Mårdh

Open full text 96 citations

Abstract

The performance of a plasmid-based ligase chain reaction (LCR) with urine specimens was compared with those of cell culture of cervical swabs and enzyme immunoassay with urine specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women who had attended a family planning clinic. The prevalence of chlamydial infection determined by LCR was 3.1%. Discrepant results among the three assays were resolved by testing urine by a second LCR assay based on the C. trachomatis chromosomal gene encoding the major outer membrane protein. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the cell cultures were 56.3, 100, 100, and 98.4%, respectively, whereas those for the enzyme immunoassay were 18.8, 100, 100, and 97.1%, respectively, and those for LCR were 87.5, 100, 100, and 99.5%, respectively. LCR thus provides a highly sensitive and specific noninvasive screening method for detecting genital chlamydial infections in women.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The performance of a plasmid-based ligase chain reaction (LCR) with urine specimens was compared with those of cell culture of cervical swabs and enzyme immunoassay with urine specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women who had attended a family planning clinic. The prevalence of chlamydial infection determined by LCR was 3.1%. Discrepant results among the three assays were resolved by testing urine by a second LCR assay based on the C. trachomatis chromosomal gene encoding the major outer membrane protein. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the cell cultures were 56.3, 100, 100, and 98.4%, respectively, whereas those for the enzyme immunoassay were 18.8, 100, 100, and 97.1%, respectively, and those for LCR were 87.5, 100, 100, and 99.5%, respectively. LCR thus provides a highly sensitive and specific noninvasive screening method for detecting genital chlamydial infections in women.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 96 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The performance of a plasmid-based ligase chain reaction (LCR) with urine specimens was compared with those of cell culture of cervical swabs and enzyme immunoassay with urine specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women who had attended a family planning clinic. The prevalence of chlamydial infection determined by LCR was 3.1%. Discrepant results among the three assays were resolved by testing urine by a second LCR assay based on the C. trachomatis chromosomal gene encoding the major outer membrane protein. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the cell cultures were 56.3, 100, 100, and 98.4%, respectively, whereas those for the enzyme immunoassay were 18.8, 100, 100, and 97.1%, respectively, and those for LCR were 87.5, 100, 100, and 99.5%, respectively. LCR thus provides a highly sensitive and specific noninvasive screening method for detecting genital chlamydial infections in women.

Key concepts: Ligase chain reaction, Chlamydia trachomatis, Immunoassay, Chlamydiaceae, Urine, Chlamydiales, Chlamydia, Polymerase chain reaction

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from women by ligase chain reaction — Research Paper | ScholarLens