DISCORDANT RESPONSES OF PROLACTINOMA TO TWO DIFFERENT DOPAMINE AGONISTS
S R Ahmed, S Shalet
Abstract
S R Ahmed, S Shalet
Abstract
A 19-year-old woman presented with headaches, temporal lobe epilepsy and primary amenorrhoea. There was a family history of multiple endocrine adenomatosis. Investigation revealed normal visual fields and acuity, hyperprolactinaemia (48 000 mU/l) and a very large pituitary tumour with extrasellar spread. Treatment with bromocriptine reduced the tumour size and the prolactin level to 2440 mU/l. Six months after the start of therapy, resistance to bromocriptine developed and the prolactin concentration progressively rose to pretreatment levels, despite increasing the dose of bromocriptine to 40 mg/d. At this stage treatment with a second dopamine agonist, pergolide, was effective in reducing the prolactin concentration to normal within four months. Serial CT scans at 1, 6 and 12 months on dopamine agonist therapy showed a progressive decrease in tumour size, which seemed to be maintained even during the period of rising prolactin concentrations due to bromocriptine resistance. This case illustrates that during dopamine agonist therapy a discrepancy may exist in the clinical response as judged by reduction in tumour size and decrease in the circulating prolactin level. Furthermore, in patients with prolactinomas, pergolide may induce a response when resistance to bromocriptine develops.
OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A 19-year-old woman presented with headaches, temporal lobe epilepsy and primary amenorrhoea. There was a family history of multiple endocrine adenomatosis. Investigation revealed normal visual fields and acuity, hyperprolactinaemia (48 000 mU/l) and a very large pituitary tumour with extrasellar spread. Treatment with bromocriptine reduced the tumour size and the prolactin level to 2440 mU/l. Six months after the start of therapy, resistance to bromocriptine developed and the prolactin concentration progressively rose to pretreatment levels, despite increasing the dose of bromocriptine to 40 mg/d. At this stage treatment with a second dopamine agonist, pergolide, was effective in reducing the prolactin concentration to normal within four months. Serial CT scans at 1, 6 and 12 months on dopamine agonist therapy showed a progressive decrease in tumour size, which seemed to be maintained even during the period of rising prolactin concentrations due to bromocriptine resistance. This case illustrates that during dopamine agonist therapy a discrepancy may exist in the clinical response as judged by reduction in tumour size and decrease in the circulating prolactin level. Furthermore, in patients with prolactinomas, pergolide may induce a response when resistance to bromocriptine develops.
Key concepts: Bromocriptine, Pergolide, Hyperprolactinaemia, Prolactin, Dopamine agonist, Endocrinology, Internal medicine, Prolactinoma