1984•PubMedRequires access

Comparison between absorbable and nonabsorbable, monofilament sutures for end-to-end arterial anastomoses in growing pigs.

Stig Steen, Lena Andersson, Peter Löwenhielm, H Stridbeck, B Walther, T Holmin

Open publisher page 37 citations

Abstract

This record does not include an abstract. Use the full-text link above if available.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An abstract is not available in the OpenAlex record for this paper.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 37 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Key concepts: Prolene, Anastomosis, Medicine, Polydioxanone, Surgery, Fibrous joint, Absorbable suture, Surgical anastomosis

Back to paper search Browse research topics Original source

Comparison between absorbable and nonabsorbable, monofilament sutures for end-to-end arterial anastomoses in growing pigs. — Research Paper | ScholarLens