2013SLAS TECHNOLOGYOpen access

Evaluation of the Fully Automated Hematological Analyzer Sysmex XE-5000 for Flow Cytometric Analysis of Peritoneal Fluid

Giuseppe Lippi, C. Cattabiani, Anna Benegiamo, Daniela Gennari, Fernanda Pavesi, Alberta Caleffi, Silvia Pipitone

Open full text 16 citations

Abstract

Although microscopy still represents the gold standard for cytometric analysis of peritoneal fluids, automated flow cytometry may improve throughput and accuracy. We evaluated the performance of total nucleated cell (TNC), white blood cell (WBC), polymorphonuclear cell (PMN), and mononuclear cell (MONO) counts of Sysmex XE-5000 on peritoneal fluids. The imprecision was excellent, being always lower than 11%, whereas linearity studies yielded correlation coefficients of 1.00 for all parameters. The carryover was always lower than 0.2%. The comparison between XE-5000 and microscopic analysis of 117 ascitic fluids yielded correlation coefficients always greater than 0.96, with mean biases <11/µL. The diagnostic accuracy versus manual microscopy was greater than that of XE-2100, especially at thresholds for septic ascites (100 versus 98% for ≥500 WBC/µL; 98 versus 93% for ≥250 PMN/µL). The correlation with manual microscopy for macrophages and mesothelial cell count was also higher for XE-5000 than for XE-2100 (0.63 versus 0.55). The results of this evaluation show optimal performance of XE-5000 for routine analysis of ascitic fluids, which are combined with the advantages of automated analysis such as high throughout, shortened turnaround time, no need of sample preparation and trained staff, reduced sample volume, and less likelihood of transcriptional errors.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Although microscopy still represents the gold standard for cytometric analysis of peritoneal fluids, automated flow cytometry may improve throughput and accuracy. We evaluated the performance of total nucleated cell (TNC), white blood cell (WBC), polymorphonuclear cell (PMN), and mononuclear cell (MONO) counts of Sysmex XE-5000 on peritoneal fluids. The imprecision was excellent, being always lower than 11%, whereas linearity studies yielded correlation coefficients of 1.00 for all parameters. The carryover was always lower than 0.2%. The comparison between XE-5000 and microscopic analysis of 117 ascitic fluids yielded correlation coefficients always greater than 0.96, with mean biases <11/µL. The diagnostic accuracy versus manual microscopy was greater than that of XE-2100, especially at thresholds for septic ascites (100 versus 98% for ≥500 WBC/µL; 98 versus 93% for ≥250 PMN/µL). The correlation with manual microscopy for macrophages and mesothelial cell count was also higher for XE-5000 than for XE-2100 (0.63 versus 0.55). The results of this evaluation show optimal performance of XE-5000 for routine analysis of ascitic fluids, which are combined with the advantages of automated analysis such as high throughout, shortened turnaround time, no need of sample preparation and trained staff, reduced sample volume, and less likelihood of transcriptional errors.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Although microscopy still represents the gold standard for cytometric analysis of peritoneal fluids, automated flow cytometry may improve throughput and accuracy. We evaluated the performance of total nucleated cell (TNC), white blood cell (WBC), polymorphonuclear cell (PMN), and mononuclear cell (MONO) counts of Sysmex XE-5000 on peritoneal fluids. The imprecision was excellent, being always lower than 11%, whereas linearity studies yielded correlation coefficients of 1.00 for all parameters. The carryover was always lower than 0.2%. The comparison between XE-5000 and microscopic analysis of 117 ascitic fluids yielded correlation coefficients always greater than 0.96, with mean biases <11/µL. The diagnostic accuracy versus manual microscopy was greater than that of XE-2100, especially at thresholds for septic ascites (100 versus 98% for ≥500 WBC/µL; 98 versus 93% for ≥250 PMN/µL). The correlation with manual microscopy for macrophages and mesothelial cell count was also higher for XE-5000 than for XE-2100 (0.63 versus 0.55). The results of this evaluation show optimal performance of XE-5000 for routine analysis of ascitic fluids, which are combined with the advantages of automated analysis such as high throughout, shortened turnaround time, no need of sample preparation and trained staff, reduced sample volume, and less likelihood of transcriptional errors.

Key concepts: Ascitic fluid, Flow cytometry, Lysis, Biomedical engineering, Turnaround time, Pathology, Peritoneal fluid, Microscopy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of the Fully Automated Hematological Analyzer Sysmex XE-5000 for Flow Cytometric Analysis of Peritoneal Fluid — Research Paper | ScholarLens