Extractive distillation and pressure‐swing distillation for THF /ethanol separation
Yinglong Wang, Peizhe Cui, Yuhong Ma, Zhen Zhang
Abstract
Yinglong Wang, Peizhe Cui, Yuhong Ma, Zhen Zhang
Abstract
Abstract BACKGROUND During the synthesis of a liquid crystal monomer, an effluent including tetrahydrofuran(THF) and ethanol is produced. Since THF and ethanol are both important solvents used in the chemical industry, it is necessary to separate the mixture of THF and ethanol for reuse. However, it is hard to effectively separate the mixture via simple distillation because a minimum azeotrope is formed in the binary system. RESULT Extractive distillation and pressure‐swing distillation are adopted to separate the mixture and carefully optimized to achieve minimization of the total annual cost (TAC). A comparison between the two processes is carried out. Pressure‐swing distillation is used to separate mixtures of THF and ethanol with various compositions. CONCLUSION The results indicate that pressure‐swing distillation performs better than extractive distillation from the standpoint of both economic considerations and product purity. The feasible sequence of high and low pressure of two columns in a pressure‐swing distillation is related to the feed composition. © 2014 Society of Chemical Industry
OpenAlex reports 91 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract BACKGROUND During the synthesis of a liquid crystal monomer, an effluent including tetrahydrofuran(THF) and ethanol is produced. Since THF and ethanol are both important solvents used in the chemical industry, it is necessary to separate the mixture of THF and ethanol for reuse. However, it is hard to effectively separate the mixture via simple distillation because a minimum azeotrope is formed in the binary system. RESULT Extractive distillation and pressure‐swing distillation are adopted to separate the mixture and carefully optimized to achieve minimization of the total annual cost (TAC). A comparison between the two processes is carried out. Pressure‐swing distillation is used to separate mixtures of THF and ethanol with various compositions. CONCLUSION The results indicate that pressure‐swing distillation performs better than extractive distillation from the standpoint of both economic considerations and product purity. The feasible sequence of high and low pressure of two columns in a pressure‐swing distillation is related to the feed composition. © 2014 Society of Chemical Industry
Key concepts: Distillation, Azeotrope, Extractive distillation, Azeotropic distillation, Batch distillation, Pressure swing adsorption, Chemistry, Process engineering