1934•Archives of Internal MedicineRequires access

CLINICAL AND PATHOLOGIC DIFFERENTIATION OF THE ACUTE LEUKEMIAS

CLAUDE ELLIS FORKNER

Open publisher page 53 citations

Abstract

Friedreich 1 in 1857 reported a case of leukemia with an acute course. Ebstein 2 in 1889 described the clinical picture of acute leukemia. Fraenkel 3 in 1895 directed attention particularly to changes in the cells of the blood, and expressed the view that all acute leukemias were lymphogenous because of the similarity of the white blood cells of these patients to lymphocytes. Naegeli 4 in 1900 described the myeloblast, thereby permitting, on the basis of the cytologic characteristics, the separation of two types of acute leukemia, myeloblastic or acute myelogenous and lymphoblastic or acute lymphatic. A sharp differentiation, however, was not always clear owing to difficulties in technic of staining blood smears and because of atypical cases which defied classification. Further elucidation of the problem was forthcoming in the discovery by Reschad and Shilling-Torgau 5 in 1913 of a third type of acute leukemia, acute monocytic leukemia. Although twenty

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Friedreich 1 in 1857 reported a case of leukemia with an acute course. Ebstein 2 in 1889 described the clinical picture of acute leukemia. Fraenkel 3 in 1895 directed attention particularly to changes in the cells of the blood, and expressed the view that all acute leukemias were lymphogenous because of the similarity of the white blood cells of these patients to lymphocytes. Naegeli 4 in 1900 described the myeloblast, thereby permitting, on the basis of the cytologic characteristics, the separation of two types of acute leukemia, myeloblastic or acute myelogenous and lymphoblastic or acute lymphatic. A sharp differentiation, however, was not always clear owing to difficulties in technic of staining blood smears and because of atypical cases which defied classification. Further elucidation of the problem was forthcoming in the discovery by Reschad and Shilling-Torgau 5 in 1913 of a third type of acute leukemia, acute monocytic leukemia. Although twenty

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 53 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Friedreich 1 in 1857 reported a case of leukemia with an acute course. Ebstein 2 in 1889 described the clinical picture of acute leukemia. Fraenkel 3 in 1895 directed attention particularly to changes in the cells of the blood, and expressed the view that all acute leukemias were lymphogenous because of the similarity of the white blood cells of these patients to lymphocytes. Naegeli 4 in 1900 described the myeloblast, thereby permitting, on the basis of the cytologic characteristics, the separation of two types of acute leukemia, myeloblastic or acute myelogenous and lymphoblastic or acute lymphatic. A sharp differentiation, however, was not always clear owing to difficulties in technic of staining blood smears and because of atypical cases which defied classification. Further elucidation of the problem was forthcoming in the discovery by Reschad and Shilling-Torgau 5 in 1913 of a third type of acute leukemia, acute monocytic leukemia. Although twenty

Key concepts: Pathology, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
CLINICAL AND PATHOLOGIC DIFFERENTIATION OF THE ACUTE LEUKEMIAS — Research Paper | ScholarLens