1987Journal of Construction Engineering and ManagementRequires access

Model for Retiring, Replacing, or Reassigning construction equipment

Michael C. Vorster, Glenn A. Sears

Open publisher page 18 citations

Abstract

Retirement and replacement models for construction equipment have been based on the notion that there is an optimum time to sell a piece of equipment to the competition. One problem with these models is that they do not explain why one's competition may have a need for the equipment when one does not. The model presented here looks at the consequential costs of downtime for each piece of equipment when assigned to specific applications. Old and unreliable equipment therefore carries a significant consequential downtime cost when used in a key production application. Likewise, new and reliable equipment carries a significant capital recovery cost, which makes it less desirable in applications where consequential costs of downtime are low. This model provides a methodology to assign equipment optimally and to identify equipment for which its owner typically has no good applications.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Retirement and replacement models for construction equipment have been based on the notion that there is an optimum time to sell a piece of equipment to the competition. One problem with these models is that they do not explain why one's competition may have a need for the equipment when one does not. The model presented here looks at the consequential costs of downtime for each piece of equipment when assigned to specific applications. Old and unreliable equipment therefore carries a significant consequential downtime cost when used in a key production application. Likewise, new and reliable equipment carries a significant capital recovery cost, which makes it less desirable in applications where consequential costs of downtime are low. This model provides a methodology to assign equipment optimally and to identify equipment for which its owner typically has no good applications.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Retirement and replacement models for construction equipment have been based on the notion that there is an optimum time to sell a piece of equipment to the competition. One problem with these models is that they do not explain why one's competition may have a need for the equipment when one does not. The model presented here looks at the consequential costs of downtime for each piece of equipment when assigned to specific applications. Old and unreliable equipment therefore carries a significant consequential downtime cost when used in a key production application. Likewise, new and reliable equipment carries a significant capital recovery cost, which makes it less desirable in applications where consequential costs of downtime are low. This model provides a methodology to assign equipment optimally and to identify equipment for which its owner typically has no good applications.

Key concepts: Downtime, Capital equipment, Competition (biology), Production (economics), Key (lock), Capital expenditure, Risk analysis (engineering), Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Model for Retiring, Replacing, or Reassigning construction equipment — Research Paper | ScholarLens