On the Accuracy of Dispositional Versus Situational Attributions
David C. Funder
Abstract
David C. Funder
Abstract
Research on attribution “error” often implies that situational attributions are generally more accurate than dispositional ones, and the widespread acceptance of this implication has had important consequences for psychology. However, evidence also exists that would tend to support the reverse conclusion. In fact, the important difference between situational and dispositional attributions is not one of accuracy, but of level of analysis.
OpenAlex reports 97 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Research on attribution “error” often implies that situational attributions are generally more accurate than dispositional ones, and the widespread acceptance of this implication has had important consequences for psychology. However, evidence also exists that would tend to support the reverse conclusion. In fact, the important difference between situational and dispositional attributions is not one of accuracy, but of level of analysis.
Key concepts: Attribution, Situational ethics, Psychology, Social psychology, Cognitive psychology