2011Journal of AsthmaRequires access

Clinical Features Cannot Distinguish Allergic from Non-allergic Asthma in Children

Scott Sinisgalli, Melanie Sue Collins, Craig M. Schramm

Open publisher page 20 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Environmental allergens are a major trigger of asthma, but not all asthmatics are allergic. This study was designed to review clinical characteristics in children with allergic and non-allergic asthma, based on responsiveness to allergy skin tests, in order to identify a combination of features that could distinguish allergic from non-allergic asthma in children. METHODS: Medical records of 321 children who had allergy skin testing were reviewed, and demographic and clinical data were compared between allergic and non-allergic patients. RESULTS: Approximately two-thirds of the asthmatic children had at least one positive skin test. These allergic patients were more likely to have a history of eczema or Medicaid insurance, but these findings had poor predictive value. There was no difference between allergic patients and non-allergic patients in terms of family history of atopy or asthma, home tobacco smoke exposure, age of onset of asthma, gender, rate of obesity, or asthma severity. Among the allergic asthma patients, neither the number of positive skin tests nor specific individual allergic sensitivities correlated with age of onset of asthma or asthma severity. CONCLUSIONS: This study failed to identify any combination of features that could reliably distinguish allergic from non-allergic asthma in children. Thus, all children with asthma should undergo allergy testing in order to identify potential allergic triggers in allergic patients and to avoid the institution of unnecessary environmental control measures in non-allergic patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: Environmental allergens are a major trigger of asthma, but not all asthmatics are allergic. This study was designed to review clinical characteristics in children with allergic and non-allergic asthma, based on responsiveness to allergy skin tests, in order to identify a combination of features that could distinguish allergic from non-allergic asthma in children. METHODS: Medical records of 321 children who had allergy skin testing were reviewed, and demographic and clinical data were compared between allergic and non-allergic patients. RESULTS: Approximately two-thirds of the asthmatic children had at least one positive skin test. These allergic patients were more likely to have a history of eczema or Medicaid insurance, but these findings had poor predictive value. There was no difference between allergic patients and non-allergic patients in terms of family history of atopy or asthma, home tobacco smoke exposure, age of onset of asthma, gender, rate of obesity, or asthma severity. Among the allergic asthma patients, neither the number of positive skin tests nor specific individual allergic sensitivities correlated with age of onset of asthma or asthma severity. CONCLUSIONS: This study failed to identify any combination of features that could reliably distinguish allergic from non-allergic asthma in children. Thus, all children with asthma should undergo allergy testing in order to identify potential allergic triggers in allergic patients and to avoid the institution of unnecessary environmental control measures in non-allergic patients.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: Environmental allergens are a major trigger of asthma, but not all asthmatics are allergic. This study was designed to review clinical characteristics in children with allergic and non-allergic asthma, based on responsiveness to allergy skin tests, in order to identify a combination of features that could distinguish allergic from non-allergic asthma in children. METHODS: Medical records of 321 children who had allergy skin testing were reviewed, and demographic and clinical data were compared between allergic and non-allergic patients. RESULTS: Approximately two-thirds of the asthmatic children had at least one positive skin test. These allergic patients were more likely to have a history of eczema or Medicaid insurance, but these findings had poor predictive value. There was no difference between allergic patients and non-allergic patients in terms of family history of atopy or asthma, home tobacco smoke exposure, age of onset of asthma, gender, rate of obesity, or asthma severity. Among the allergic asthma patients, neither the number of positive skin tests nor specific individual allergic sensitivities correlated with age of onset of asthma or asthma severity. CONCLUSIONS: This study failed to identify any combination of features that could reliably distinguish allergic from non-allergic asthma in children. Thus, all children with asthma should undergo allergy testing in order to identify potential allergic triggers in allergic patients and to avoid the institution of unnecessary environmental control measures in non-allergic patients.

Key concepts: Medicine, Asthma, Allergy, Allergic asthma, Atopy, Allergic inflammation, Family history, Immunology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical Features Cannot Distinguish Allergic from Non-allergic Asthma in Children — Research Paper | ScholarLens