F-wave latency, the most sensitive nerve conduction parameter in patients with diabetes mellitus
Henning Andersen, Erik St�lberg, Bj�rn Falck
Abstract
Henning Andersen, Erik St�lberg, Bj�rn Falck
Abstract
In this study we examined the diagnostic sensitivity of minimal F-wave latency, F-wave persistence, motor nerve conduction velocity (MCV), and amplitude of the compound motor action potential (CMAP) of the median, ulnar, tibial, and peroneal nerves, and of sensory conduction velocity (SCV) and sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) amplitude of the sural nerve in 82 diabetic patients. For the median, ulnar, and tibial nerves the Z scores of the minimal F-wave latency were significantly larger than those of the MCV, and for all four motor nerves the Z scores of the minimal F-wave latency were significantly larger than those of the amplitude of the CMAP. The Z scores of the peroneal minimal F-wave latency exceeded those of peroneal MCV, sural SCV, and sural SNAP. F-wave persistence did not differ significantly from the reference values. In conclusion, minimal F-wave latency is the most sensitive measure for detection of nerve pathology and should be considered in electrophysiological studies of diabetic patients.
OpenAlex reports 156 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In this study we examined the diagnostic sensitivity of minimal F-wave latency, F-wave persistence, motor nerve conduction velocity (MCV), and amplitude of the compound motor action potential (CMAP) of the median, ulnar, tibial, and peroneal nerves, and of sensory conduction velocity (SCV) and sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) amplitude of the sural nerve in 82 diabetic patients. For the median, ulnar, and tibial nerves the Z scores of the minimal F-wave latency were significantly larger than those of the MCV, and for all four motor nerves the Z scores of the minimal F-wave latency were significantly larger than those of the amplitude of the CMAP. The Z scores of the peroneal minimal F-wave latency exceeded those of peroneal MCV, sural SCV, and sural SNAP. F-wave persistence did not differ significantly from the reference values. In conclusion, minimal F-wave latency is the most sensitive measure for detection of nerve pathology and should be considered in electrophysiological studies of diabetic patients.
Key concepts: F wave, Compound muscle action potential, Latency (audio), Nerve conduction velocity, Medicine, Sural nerve, Tibial nerve, Electrophysiology