2Q: A Low Overhead High Performance Buffer Management Replacement Algorithm
Theodore Johnson, Dennis Shasha
Abstract
Theodore Johnson, Dennis Shasha
Abstract
In a path-breaking paper last year Pat and Betty O'Neil and Gerhard Weikum proposed a self-tuning improvement to the Least Recently Used (LRU) buffer management algorithm[15]. Their improvement is called LRU/k and advocates giving priority to buffer pages based on the kth most recent access. (The standard LRU algorithm is denoted LRU/1 according to this terminology.) If P1's kth most recent access is more more recent than P2's, then P1 will be replaced after P2. Intuitively, LRU/k for k ? 1 is a good strategy, because it gives low priority to pages that have been scanned or to pages that belong to a big randomly accessed file (e.g., the account file in TPC/A). They found that LRU/2 achieves most of the advantage of their method. The one problem of LRU/2 is the processor Supported by U.S. Office of Naval Research #N00014-91-J1472 and #N00014-92-J-1719, U.S. National Science Foundation grants #CCR-9103953 and IRI-9224601, and USRA #5555-19. Part of this work was performed while Theodo...
OpenAlex reports 616 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In a path-breaking paper last year Pat and Betty O'Neil and Gerhard Weikum proposed a self-tuning improvement to the Least Recently Used (LRU) buffer management algorithm[15]. Their improvement is called LRU/k and advocates giving priority to buffer pages based on the kth most recent access. (The standard LRU algorithm is denoted LRU/1 according to this terminology.) If P1's kth most recent access is more more recent than P2's, then P1 will be replaced after P2. Intuitively, LRU/k for k ? 1 is a good strategy, because it gives low priority to pages that have been scanned or to pages that belong to a big randomly accessed file (e.g., the account file in TPC/A). They found that LRU/2 achieves most of the advantage of their method. The one problem of LRU/2 is the processor Supported by U.S. Office of Naval Research #N00014-91-J1472 and #N00014-92-J-1719, U.S. National Science Foundation grants #CCR-9103953 and IRI-9224601, and USRA #5555-19. Part of this work was performed while Theodo...
Key concepts: Computer science, Overhead (engineering), Buffer (optical fiber), Algorithm, Computer network, Operating system, Telecommunications