1994•Clinical and Experimental HypertensionRequires access

Evaluation of Cilazapril Versus Captopril in Patients with Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension

James Geoffrey Stevenson, E.W. Chideckel

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cilazapril, a long-acting angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, was evaluated against captopril for safety and efficacy in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension. METHODS: One hundred thirty-two patients were randomly assigned to receive cilazapril, 2.5 mg once daily; 62 patients were randomly assigned to receive captopril, 25 mg twice daily. If necessary, dosage was increased to 5.0 mg cilazapril, once daily or 50 mg captopril, twice daily. Adjunctive hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 mg once daily) was later added to this higher dosage, if required. RESULTS: After eight weeks of monotherapy, sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) had decreased 7.5 mm Hg from baseline for cilazapril-treated patients, versus 5.6 mm Hg for captopril-treated patients. These decreases were 7.6 mm Hg and 6.8 mm Hg for cilazapril and captopril, respectively, at Week 12. At Week 8, 36.5% of patients receiving cilazapril had achieved a SDBP of 90 mm Hg or less, versus 26.0% of captopril-treated patients. The overall responder rate at Week 8 was 47.1% for cilazapril and 34.0% for captopril. None of these differences between the two treatment groups were statistically significant. Both drugs alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide were well tolerated during the 12-week treatment period. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that cilazapril, alone or with adjunctive hydrochlorothiazide, is effective and well tolerated as treatment for mild to moderate hypertension.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: Cilazapril, a long-acting angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, was evaluated against captopril for safety and efficacy in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension. METHODS: One hundred thirty-two patients were randomly assigned to receive cilazapril, 2.5 mg once daily; 62 patients were randomly assigned to receive captopril, 25 mg twice daily. If necessary, dosage was increased to 5.0 mg cilazapril, once daily or 50 mg captopril, twice daily. Adjunctive hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 mg once daily) was later added to this higher dosage, if required. RESULTS: After eight weeks of monotherapy, sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) had decreased 7.5 mm Hg from baseline for cilazapril-treated patients, versus 5.6 mm Hg for captopril-treated patients. These decreases were 7.6 mm Hg and 6.8 mm Hg for cilazapril and captopril, respectively, at Week 12. At Week 8, 36.5% of patients receiving cilazapril had achieved a SDBP of 90 mm Hg or less, versus 26.0% of captopril-treated patients. The overall responder rate at Week 8 was 47.1% for cilazapril and 34.0% for captopril. None of these differences between the two treatment groups were statistically significant. Both drugs alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide were well tolerated during the 12-week treatment period. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that cilazapril, alone or with adjunctive hydrochlorothiazide, is effective and well tolerated as treatment for mild to moderate hypertension.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cilazapril, a long-acting angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, was evaluated against captopril for safety and efficacy in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension. METHODS: One hundred thirty-two patients were randomly assigned to receive cilazapril, 2.5 mg once daily; 62 patients were randomly assigned to receive captopril, 25 mg twice daily. If necessary, dosage was increased to 5.0 mg cilazapril, once daily or 50 mg captopril, twice daily. Adjunctive hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 mg once daily) was later added to this higher dosage, if required. RESULTS: After eight weeks of monotherapy, sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) had decreased 7.5 mm Hg from baseline for cilazapril-treated patients, versus 5.6 mm Hg for captopril-treated patients. These decreases were 7.6 mm Hg and 6.8 mm Hg for cilazapril and captopril, respectively, at Week 12. At Week 8, 36.5% of patients receiving cilazapril had achieved a SDBP of 90 mm Hg or less, versus 26.0% of captopril-treated patients. The overall responder rate at Week 8 was 47.1% for cilazapril and 34.0% for captopril. None of these differences between the two treatment groups were statistically significant. Both drugs alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide were well tolerated during the 12-week treatment period. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that cilazapril, alone or with adjunctive hydrochlorothiazide, is effective and well tolerated as treatment for mild to moderate hypertension.

Key concepts: Cilazapril, Captopril, Hydrochlorothiazide, Medicine, Blood pressure, Angiotensin-converting enzyme, Internal medicine, Diuretic

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of Cilazapril Versus Captopril in Patients with Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension — Research Paper | ScholarLens