Examination of Two Independent Kinetic Assays for Determining the Inhibition of Carbonic Anhydrases I and II: Structure–Activity Comparison of Sulfamates and Sulfamides

Enzyme inhibition assays often require deviations from physiological conditions. For carbonic anhydrases, procedures involving native CO(2) and non-native substrates have been used. We compared a native and a non-native substrate in the context of inhibition of human carbonic anhydrases I and II by examining various sulfamate and sulfamide compounds in two kinetic assays: hydration of CO(2) and hydrolysis of 4-nitrophenylacetate. For carbonic anhydrase II, the two assays consistently generated similar K(i) values, with the relative difference between the assays never exceeding 2.5-fold. However, for carbonic anhydrase I there was more variability between the two assays, with K(i) values for three compounds differing by more than 2.5-fold, up to eightfold. In the CO(2) hydration assay, some sulfamates and sulfamides exhibited mixed kinetics or partial inhibition. Our results indicate that K(i) or K(d) values from carbonic anhydrase assays involving non-native substrates should be confirmed by assays that use CO(2) (or HCO), to establish pharmacological relevance. From structure-activity comparisons, the sulfamate is more effective than the sulfamide in inhibiting carbonic anhydrase I and II, but the sulfamate does not confer selectivity. In contrast, the sulfonamide confers selectivity for carbonic anhydrase I (10- to 30-fold). Selectivity for carbonic anhydrase II occurred with the substituted fructose moiety, especially the d-enantiomer (>100-fold).