1997•Journal of Forensic PsychiatryRequires access

Is the jury trial a lottery?

Tom McClintock

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Acquittals in some recent high-profile criminal cases have led to criticism of the jury system and calls for its modification. The central idea that a jury trial is ‘of one's peers’ is examined in the light of legislation affecting the operation of the jury and the process of jury empanelment. Direct research observation of jury decision-making is prohibited by legislation in the UK and USA and this has led to a legalistic emphasis in this research area, which is regrettable. The ability of the jury decision to reflect social opinion about the nature of right and wrong is emphasized. Rather than the jury being the scapegoat for those who have criticisms of the criminal justice system, the real culprit is seen as simply the end product of the legal process.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Acquittals in some recent high-profile criminal cases have led to criticism of the jury system and calls for its modification. The central idea that a jury trial is ‘of one's peers’ is examined in the light of legislation affecting the operation of the jury and the process of jury empanelment. Direct research observation of jury decision-making is prohibited by legislation in the UK and USA and this has led to a legalistic emphasis in this research area, which is regrettable. The ability of the jury decision to reflect social opinion about the nature of right and wrong is emphasized. Rather than the jury being the scapegoat for those who have criticisms of the criminal justice system, the real culprit is seen as simply the end product of the legal process.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Acquittals in some recent high-profile criminal cases have led to criticism of the jury system and calls for its modification. The central idea that a jury trial is ‘of one's peers’ is examined in the light of legislation affecting the operation of the jury and the process of jury empanelment. Direct research observation of jury decision-making is prohibited by legislation in the UK and USA and this has led to a legalistic emphasis in this research area, which is regrettable. The ability of the jury decision to reflect social opinion about the nature of right and wrong is emphasized. Rather than the jury being the scapegoat for those who have criticisms of the criminal justice system, the real culprit is seen as simply the end product of the legal process.

Key concepts: Jury, Hung jury, Jury trial, Legislation, Law, Political science, Criminal justice, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Is the jury trial a lottery? — Research Paper | ScholarLens