Comparative flow cytometric analysis of Ki‐67 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in solid neoplasms
Kim Steck, Adel K. El‐Naggar
Abstract
Kim Steck, Adel K. El‐Naggar
Abstract
The proliferation associated antigens, Ki-67 and proliferating-cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), have been widely used in studies assessing the growth fraction in human malignancies. It remains unclear, however, whether these markers yield similar assessments of proliferative activity in any given neoplasm. In this study, we compared Ki-67 and PCNA expression in 93 malignant solid neoplasms using bivariate flow cytometric analysis of these antigens and DNA content. The growth fractions measured by Ki-67 and PCNA were compared and correlated with acridine orange (AO) analysis and tumor grade. Our results indicate a significant difference between Ki-67 and PCNA values in neoplasms of low and intermediate grade (P = 0.002); Ki-67 values were significantly lower than those obtained by PCNA in this group. No statistical difference between Ki-67 and PCNA values was found in high grade neoplasms (P = 0.38). Analysis of different cell cycle compartments indicates that the observed difference in the positivity of these markers was due to their differential expression in the G0/1 segment of the cell cycle. We conclude that Ki-67 may better reflect the proliferative activity in solid neoplasms than does PCNA.
OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The proliferation associated antigens, Ki-67 and proliferating-cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), have been widely used in studies assessing the growth fraction in human malignancies. It remains unclear, however, whether these markers yield similar assessments of proliferative activity in any given neoplasm. In this study, we compared Ki-67 and PCNA expression in 93 malignant solid neoplasms using bivariate flow cytometric analysis of these antigens and DNA content. The growth fractions measured by Ki-67 and PCNA were compared and correlated with acridine orange (AO) analysis and tumor grade. Our results indicate a significant difference between Ki-67 and PCNA values in neoplasms of low and intermediate grade (P = 0.002); Ki-67 values were significantly lower than those obtained by PCNA in this group. No statistical difference between Ki-67 and PCNA values was found in high grade neoplasms (P = 0.38). Analysis of different cell cycle compartments indicates that the observed difference in the positivity of these markers was due to their differential expression in the G0/1 segment of the cell cycle. We conclude that Ki-67 may better reflect the proliferative activity in solid neoplasms than does PCNA.
Key concepts: Proliferating cell nuclear antigen, Cell cycle, Flow cytometry, Antigen, Biology, Ki-67, Cell growth, Molecular biology