1989•Global Biogeochemical CyclesRequires access

Ratios of dry to wet deposition of sulfur as derived from preliminary field data

B. B. Hicks, T. P. Meyers, C. W. Fairall, Volker A. Mohnen, Donald A. Dolske

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

Preliminary data obtained in the operation of a nested‐network dry deposition measurement program in the eastern United States are used in conjunction with wet deposition data obtained at (or near) the same sites to investigate the variability of ratios of dry to wet deposition of sulfur (as sulfur dioxide and submicron sulfate for dry deposition, and as sulfate for wet deposition). On a monthly basis, the ratio is extremely variable at every location; however, a more coherent picture arises when the average annual cycle is considered. The sites studied here (Oak Ridge, Tennessee; State College, Pennsylvania; Whiteface Mountain, New York; and Bondville, Illinois) yield dry/wet ratios for sulfur deposition that minimize in the summer, with values of about 0.3. At other times of the year, values sometimes exceeding 2.0 are obtained. A summer peak at Oak Ridge is tentatively attributed to the effects of a local drought. The variability is such that use of dry/wet ratios to estimate dry deposition rates when only wet deposition data are available cannot be recommended.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Preliminary data obtained in the operation of a nested‐network dry deposition measurement program in the eastern United States are used in conjunction with wet deposition data obtained at (or near) the same sites to investigate the variability of ratios of dry to wet deposition of sulfur (as sulfur dioxide and submicron sulfate for dry deposition, and as sulfate for wet deposition). On a monthly basis, the ratio is extremely variable at every location; however, a more coherent picture arises when the average annual cycle is considered. The sites studied here (Oak Ridge, Tennessee; State College, Pennsylvania; Whiteface Mountain, New York; and Bondville, Illinois) yield dry/wet ratios for sulfur deposition that minimize in the summer, with values of about 0.3. At other times of the year, values sometimes exceeding 2.0 are obtained. A summer peak at Oak Ridge is tentatively attributed to the effects of a local drought. The variability is such that use of dry/wet ratios to estimate dry deposition rates when only wet deposition data are available cannot be recommended.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Preliminary data obtained in the operation of a nested‐network dry deposition measurement program in the eastern United States are used in conjunction with wet deposition data obtained at (or near) the same sites to investigate the variability of ratios of dry to wet deposition of sulfur (as sulfur dioxide and submicron sulfate for dry deposition, and as sulfate for wet deposition). On a monthly basis, the ratio is extremely variable at every location; however, a more coherent picture arises when the average annual cycle is considered. The sites studied here (Oak Ridge, Tennessee; State College, Pennsylvania; Whiteface Mountain, New York; and Bondville, Illinois) yield dry/wet ratios for sulfur deposition that minimize in the summer, with values of about 0.3. At other times of the year, values sometimes exceeding 2.0 are obtained. A summer peak at Oak Ridge is tentatively attributed to the effects of a local drought. The variability is such that use of dry/wet ratios to estimate dry deposition rates when only wet deposition data are available cannot be recommended.

Key concepts: Deposition (geology), Sulfate, Sulfur, Environmental science, Sulfur dioxide, Ridge, Yield (engineering), Hydrology (agriculture)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Ratios of dry to wet deposition of sulfur as derived from preliminary field data — Research Paper | ScholarLens