2001Unpublished venueRequires access

Development of a Bridge Replacement Guide for County Engineers, Phase I

Michael H. Triche, Xiao Wen-jun, James A. Richardson

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

With over one-third of county bridges in Alabama rated as structurally deficient or functionally obsolete, and replacement funds increasingly scarce, the development of cost-effective replacement strategies is critical. To accomplish this goal, it would be helpful to know how various types of bridges and their components deteriorate, how many years they can serve, and which advantages and disadvantages they have in the area of durability performance. A critical aspect of bridge rehabilitation and replacement is to determine the most appropriate time for bridge repair and replacement. This can be done by evaluating the durability performance of various county bridges as well as establishing reasonable bridge deterioration models for them and their components. This report outlines the progress of the first year of this two-year project and gives the deterioration rates of the common bridge types located on the Alabama County road system. Specifically, seven bridge superstructure types were considered in this study along with three different deck types. The 1999 National Inspection Inventory served as the basis of development. Results from this first phase will be combined with cost data obtained from the second phase of this project with the end product of this research being a Bridge Replacement Guide for County Engineers. This initial phase has defined the bridge deterioration rates of common superstructure types.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

With over one-third of county bridges in Alabama rated as structurally deficient or functionally obsolete, and replacement funds increasingly scarce, the development of cost-effective replacement strategies is critical. To accomplish this goal, it would be helpful to know how various types of bridges and their components deteriorate, how many years they can serve, and which advantages and disadvantages they have in the area of durability performance. A critical aspect of bridge rehabilitation and replacement is to determine the most appropriate time for bridge repair and replacement. This can be done by evaluating the durability performance of various county bridges as well as establishing reasonable bridge deterioration models for them and their components. This report outlines the progress of the first year of this two-year project and gives the deterioration rates of the common bridge types located on the Alabama County road system. Specifically, seven bridge superstructure types were considered in this study along with three different deck types. The 1999 National Inspection Inventory served as the basis of development. Results from this first phase will be combined with cost data obtained from the second phase of this project with the end product of this research being a Bridge Replacement Guide for County Engineers. This initial phase has defined the bridge deterioration rates of common superstructure types.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

With over one-third of county bridges in Alabama rated as structurally deficient or functionally obsolete, and replacement funds increasingly scarce, the development of cost-effective replacement strategies is critical. To accomplish this goal, it would be helpful to know how various types of bridges and their components deteriorate, how many years they can serve, and which advantages and disadvantages they have in the area of durability performance. A critical aspect of bridge rehabilitation and replacement is to determine the most appropriate time for bridge repair and replacement. This can be done by evaluating the durability performance of various county bridges as well as establishing reasonable bridge deterioration models for them and their components. This report outlines the progress of the first year of this two-year project and gives the deterioration rates of the common bridge types located on the Alabama County road system. Specifically, seven bridge superstructure types were considered in this study along with three different deck types. The 1999 National Inspection Inventory served as the basis of development. Results from this first phase will be combined with cost data obtained from the second phase of this project with the end product of this research being a Bridge Replacement Guide for County Engineers. This initial phase has defined the bridge deterioration rates of common superstructure types.

Key concepts: Bridge (graph theory), Durability, Engineering, Construction engineering, Forensic engineering, Transport engineering, Civil engineering, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Development of a Bridge Replacement Guide for County Engineers, Phase I — Research Paper | ScholarLens