1996Water Resources ResearchRequires access

Turbidity‐Controlled Suspended Sediment Sampling for Runoff‐Event Load Estimation

Jack Lewis

Open publisher page 283 citations

Abstract

For estimating suspended sediment concentration (SSC) in rivers, turbidity is generally a much better predictor than water discharge. Although it is now possible to collect continuous turbidity data even at remote sites, sediment sampling and load estimation are still conventionally based on discharge. With frequent calibration the relation of turbidity to SSC could be used to estimate suspended loads more efficiently. In the proposed system a programmable data logger signals a pumping sampler to collect SSC specimens at specific turbidity thresholds. Sampling of dense field records of SSC and turbidity is simulated to investigate the feasibility and efficiency of turbidity‐controlled sampling for estimating sediment loads during runoff events. Measurements of SSC and turbidity were collected at 10‐min intervals from five storm events in a small mountainous watershed that exports predominantly fine sediment. In the simulations, samples containing a mean of 4 to 11 specimens, depending on storm magnitude, were selected from each storm's record, and event loads were estimated by predicting SSC from regressions on turbidity. Using simple linear regression, the five loads were estimated with root mean square errors between 1.9 and 7.7%, compared to errors of 8.8 to 23.2% for sediment rating curve estimates based on the same samples. An estimator for the variance of the load estimate is imprecise for small sample sizes and sensitive to violations in regression model assumptions. The sampling method has potential for estimating the load of any water quality constituent that has a better correlate, measurable in situ, than discharge.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

For estimating suspended sediment concentration (SSC) in rivers, turbidity is generally a much better predictor than water discharge. Although it is now possible to collect continuous turbidity data even at remote sites, sediment sampling and load estimation are still conventionally based on discharge. With frequent calibration the relation of turbidity to SSC could be used to estimate suspended loads more efficiently. In the proposed system a programmable data logger signals a pumping sampler to collect SSC specimens at specific turbidity thresholds. Sampling of dense field records of SSC and turbidity is simulated to investigate the feasibility and efficiency of turbidity‐controlled sampling for estimating sediment loads during runoff events. Measurements of SSC and turbidity were collected at 10‐min intervals from five storm events in a small mountainous watershed that exports predominantly fine sediment. In the simulations, samples containing a mean of 4 to 11 specimens, depending on storm magnitude, were selected from each storm's record, and event loads were estimated by predicting SSC from regressions on turbidity. Using simple linear regression, the five loads were estimated with root mean square errors between 1.9 and 7.7%, compared to errors of 8.8 to 23.2% for sediment rating curve estimates based on the same samples. An estimator for the variance of the load estimate is imprecise for small sample sizes and sensitive to violations in regression model assumptions. The sampling method has potential for estimating the load of any water quality constituent that has a better correlate, measurable in situ, than discharge.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 283 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

For estimating suspended sediment concentration (SSC) in rivers, turbidity is generally a much better predictor than water discharge. Although it is now possible to collect continuous turbidity data even at remote sites, sediment sampling and load estimation are still conventionally based on discharge. With frequent calibration the relation of turbidity to SSC could be used to estimate suspended loads more efficiently. In the proposed system a programmable data logger signals a pumping sampler to collect SSC specimens at specific turbidity thresholds. Sampling of dense field records of SSC and turbidity is simulated to investigate the feasibility and efficiency of turbidity‐controlled sampling for estimating sediment loads during runoff events. Measurements of SSC and turbidity were collected at 10‐min intervals from five storm events in a small mountainous watershed that exports predominantly fine sediment. In the simulations, samples containing a mean of 4 to 11 specimens, depending on storm magnitude, were selected from each storm's record, and event loads were estimated by predicting SSC from regressions on turbidity. Using simple linear regression, the five loads were estimated with root mean square errors between 1.9 and 7.7%, compared to errors of 8.8 to 23.2% for sediment rating curve estimates based on the same samples. An estimator for the variance of the load estimate is imprecise for small sample sizes and sensitive to violations in regression model assumptions. The sampling method has potential for estimating the load of any water quality constituent that has a better correlate, measurable in situ, than discharge.

Key concepts: Turbidity, Environmental science, Sediment, Sampling (signal processing), Hydrology (agriculture), Surface runoff, Storm, Rating curve

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Turbidity‐Controlled Suspended Sediment Sampling for Runoff‐Event Load Estimation — Research Paper | ScholarLens