Comparison of Green, Blue and Infrared Light in Wrist and Forehead Photoplethysmography
Vytautas Vizbara
Abstract
Vytautas Vizbara
Abstract
In this study we compared LED light sources of three different wavelengths: blue, green and infrared for the use in wrist and forehead photoplethysmography ( PPG ). Criteria for comparison were root mean square ( RMS ), pulsating to stationary tissue component ratio ( AC/DC ) and artifact to signal ratio ( ASR ). Our study showed that the green light is the most suitable for the wrist PPG and an infrared light source is better for the forehead PPG .
OpenAlex reports 40 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In this study we compared LED light sources of three different wavelengths: blue, green and infrared for the use in wrist and forehead photoplethysmography ( PPG ). Criteria for comparison were root mean square ( RMS ), pulsating to stationary tissue component ratio ( AC/DC ) and artifact to signal ratio ( ASR ). Our study showed that the green light is the most suitable for the wrist PPG and an infrared light source is better for the forehead PPG .
Key concepts: Photoplethysmogram, Forehead, Wrist, Infrared, Artifact (error), Biomedical engineering, Optics, Medicine