2010Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology)Open access

Effects of finishing strategy on performance of Belgian Blue × Friesian and Limousin × Friesian steers

M.G. Keane

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

Belgian Blue and Limousin bulls are used for cross-breeding with Holstein Friesian dairy\ncows in Ireland. In beef winter-finishing enterprises, a preliminary feeding period sometimes\nprecedes the finishing period. The optimum feeding level for this period has not been\nestablished. The objective of this study was to compare lifetime performance of Belgian\nBlue × Holstein Friesian (BB) and Limousin × Holstein Friesian (LM) steers and to\ndetermine the effects of three finishing strategies on performance and carcass traits. Fortyeight\nspring-born male calves (24 BB and 24 LM), the progeny of Limousin and Belgian\nBlue bulls out of Holstein Friesian cows, were reared together to slaughter. At about 19\nmonths of age they were assigned to one of three finishing strategies involving grass silage\nad libitum plus 0, 3 or 6 kg concentrates per head daily for 112 days (preliminary period)\nfollowed by concentrates ad libitum to slaughter at 610 kg live weight. Slaughter weight and\ncarcass weight did not differ between the breed types but BB had a higher kill-out proportion,\nbetter carcass conformation and lower carcass fatness. Live-weight gains during the\npreliminary period were 431, 914 and 1134 g/day (s.e. 31.8; P < 0.001) for the 0, 3 and 6\nkg/day concentrate levels, respectively. Overall gains for the combined preliminary and\nfinishing periods for the treatments in the same order were 945, 1101 and 1081 g/day (s.e.\n36.1; P < 0.01). There were few differences between the finishing treatments in slaughter\nweight, carcass weight or carcass traits. It is concluded that general productivity is similar\nfor BB and LM but BB have superior carcass traits. Where a preliminary feeding period\nprecedes a finishing period on ad libitum concentrates, animals fed a low level of supplementary\nconcentrates require less feed energy to reach a fixed slaughter weight than those\nfed none or a higher level of supplementary concentrates.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Belgian Blue and Limousin bulls are used for cross-breeding with Holstein Friesian dairy\ncows in Ireland. In beef winter-finishing enterprises, a preliminary feeding period sometimes\nprecedes the finishing period. The optimum feeding level for this period has not been\nestablished. The objective of this study was to compare lifetime performance of Belgian\nBlue × Holstein Friesian (BB) and Limousin × Holstein Friesian (LM) steers and to\ndetermine the effects of three finishing strategies on performance and carcass traits. Fortyeight\nspring-born male calves (24 BB and 24 LM), the progeny of Limousin and Belgian\nBlue bulls out of Holstein Friesian cows, were reared together to slaughter. At about 19\nmonths of age they were assigned to one of three finishing strategies involving grass silage\nad libitum plus 0, 3 or 6 kg concentrates per head daily for 112 days (preliminary period)\nfollowed by concentrates ad libitum to slaughter at 610 kg live weight. Slaughter weight and\ncarcass weight did not differ between the breed types but BB had a higher kill-out proportion,\nbetter carcass conformation and lower carcass fatness. Live-weight gains during the\npreliminary period were 431, 914 and 1134 g/day (s.e. 31.8; P < 0.001) for the 0, 3 and 6\nkg/day concentrate levels, respectively. Overall gains for the combined preliminary and\nfinishing periods for the treatments in the same order were 945, 1101 and 1081 g/day (s.e.\n36.1; P < 0.01). There were few differences between the finishing treatments in slaughter\nweight, carcass weight or carcass traits. It is concluded that general productivity is similar\nfor BB and LM but BB have superior carcass traits. Where a preliminary feeding period\nprecedes a finishing period on ad libitum concentrates, animals fed a low level of supplementary\nconcentrates require less feed energy to reach a fixed slaughter weight than those\nfed none or a higher level of supplementary concentrates.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Belgian Blue and Limousin bulls are used for cross-breeding with Holstein Friesian dairy\ncows in Ireland. In beef winter-finishing enterprises, a preliminary feeding period sometimes\nprecedes the finishing period. The optimum feeding level for this period has not been\nestablished. The objective of this study was to compare lifetime performance of Belgian\nBlue × Holstein Friesian (BB) and Limousin × Holstein Friesian (LM) steers and to\ndetermine the effects of three finishing strategies on performance and carcass traits. Fortyeight\nspring-born male calves (24 BB and 24 LM), the progeny of Limousin and Belgian\nBlue bulls out of Holstein Friesian cows, were reared together to slaughter. At about 19\nmonths of age they were assigned to one of three finishing strategies involving grass silage\nad libitum plus 0, 3 or 6 kg concentrates per head daily for 112 days (preliminary period)\nfollowed by concentrates ad libitum to slaughter at 610 kg live weight. Slaughter weight and\ncarcass weight did not differ between the breed types but BB had a higher kill-out proportion,\nbetter carcass conformation and lower carcass fatness. Live-weight gains during the\npreliminary period were 431, 914 and 1134 g/day (s.e. 31.8; P < 0.001) for the 0, 3 and 6\nkg/day concentrate levels, respectively. Overall gains for the combined preliminary and\nfinishing periods for the treatments in the same order were 945, 1101 and 1081 g/day (s.e.\n36.1; P < 0.01). There were few differences between the finishing treatments in slaughter\nweight, carcass weight or carcass traits. It is concluded that general productivity is similar\nfor BB and LM but BB have superior carcass traits. Where a preliminary feeding period\nprecedes a finishing period on ad libitum concentrates, animals fed a low level of supplementary\nconcentrates require less feed energy to reach a fixed slaughter weight than those\nfed none or a higher level of supplementary concentrates.

Key concepts: Animal science, Breed, Carcass weight, Silage, Biology, Body weight, Veterinary medicine, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effects of finishing strategy on performance of Belgian Blue × Friesian and Limousin × Friesian steers — Research Paper | ScholarLens