Measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient with simultaneous MR/positron emission tomography in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis: Comparison with 18F‐FDG‐PET

PURPOSE: To characterize peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of different histologically proven primary tumors based on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and (18) F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients underwent simultaneous MR/PET after clinically indicated (18) F-FDG-PET/CT. For all patients, histology of the primary tumor was obtained. MR protocol comprised anatomical imaging and axial DWI. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps and FDG-PET were co-registered for evaluation of ADC and standard uptake value (SUV) of peritoneal lesions. Both lesion- and patient-based analysis was performed. Up to four peritoneal lesions were evaluated per patient. Mean and maximum standard uptake value (SUVmean , SUVmax ), mean and minimum ADC (ADCmean , ADCmin ) of each lesion were assessed. Spearman rank correlation (rs ) of ADC and SUV were calculated. SUV and ADC of ovarian and colorectal cancer lesions were compared using Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: Measurable lesions (n = 52) were found in 20 of 41 PC patients. Moderate, but significant correlation existed between ADC and SUV in the lesion-based as well as the patient-based analysis (lesion-based: SUVmean versus ADCmean rs = -0.58; SUVmax versus ADCmin rs = -0.56, all P < 0.0001; patient-based: SUVmean versus ADCmean rs = -0.64, P = 0.002; SUVmax versus ADCmin rs = -0.60, P = 0.005). ADC and SUV differed significantly between ovarian and colorectal cancer lesions (ADCmin : P < 0.0001; ADCmean : P < 0.0001; SUVmax : P = 0.002; SUVmean : P = 0.005). Overall, mucinous tumor entities showed a tendency to higher ADC and lower SUV. CONCLUSION: PC lesions showed significant differences in glucose uptake and diffusion characteristics depending on primary tumor histology. These differences should be considered when interpreting FDG-PET and DWI in PC patients.