1986•HistopathologyRequires access

Solitary (localized) fibrous mesothelioma: evidence against mesothelial cell origin

Peter A. Dervan, Brendan R. Tobin, Mairead O’Connor

Open publisher page 135 citations

Abstract

Five cases of solitary (localized) fibrous mesothelioma were studied immunohistochemically, utilizing monoclonal antibodies against high and low molecular weight cytokeratin, vimentin, carcinoembryonic antigen, epithelial membrane antigen and factor VIII related antigen. In contrast to normal mesothelium and contrary to previous reports from malignant mesotheliomas all the tumours were negative for keratin. They were strongly positive for vimentin. Two cases were studied electron microscopically; no ultrastructural evidence of mesothelial cell differentiation was identified. Our immunohistochemical and ultrastructural findings argue against a mesothelial cell origin, whereas the presence of vimentin suggests a mesenchymal histogenesis. It is postulated that these tumours arise from sub-mesothelial mesenchymal connective tissue.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Five cases of solitary (localized) fibrous mesothelioma were studied immunohistochemically, utilizing monoclonal antibodies against high and low molecular weight cytokeratin, vimentin, carcinoembryonic antigen, epithelial membrane antigen and factor VIII related antigen. In contrast to normal mesothelium and contrary to previous reports from malignant mesotheliomas all the tumours were negative for keratin. They were strongly positive for vimentin. Two cases were studied electron microscopically; no ultrastructural evidence of mesothelial cell differentiation was identified. Our immunohistochemical and ultrastructural findings argue against a mesothelial cell origin, whereas the presence of vimentin suggests a mesenchymal histogenesis. It is postulated that these tumours arise from sub-mesothelial mesenchymal connective tissue.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 135 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Five cases of solitary (localized) fibrous mesothelioma were studied immunohistochemically, utilizing monoclonal antibodies against high and low molecular weight cytokeratin, vimentin, carcinoembryonic antigen, epithelial membrane antigen and factor VIII related antigen. In contrast to normal mesothelium and contrary to previous reports from malignant mesotheliomas all the tumours were negative for keratin. They were strongly positive for vimentin. Two cases were studied electron microscopically; no ultrastructural evidence of mesothelial cell differentiation was identified. Our immunohistochemical and ultrastructural findings argue against a mesothelial cell origin, whereas the presence of vimentin suggests a mesenchymal histogenesis. It is postulated that these tumours arise from sub-mesothelial mesenchymal connective tissue.

Key concepts: Histogenesis, Vimentin, Mesothelial Cell, Pathology, Mesothelium, Cytokeratin, Immunohistochemistry, Carcinoembryonic antigen

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Solitary (localized) fibrous mesothelioma: evidence against mesothelial cell origin — Research Paper | ScholarLens