2005Presidential Studies QuarterlyRequires access

The Law: When Law and Politics Collide: Presidents and the Use of the Twenty‐Fifth Amendment

Nancy Kassop

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Since the ratification of the Twenty‐Fifth Amendment in 1967, presidents have been advised by White House counsels on how and when to apply the sections that address temporary vacancies in the office of the president and transfers of power during such times. Early experience with presidential illness and incapacitation under the amendment during the Reagan administration indicated that counsels recognized the constitutional and practical purposes of these provisions, but encountered opposition from presidents and political advisers who viewed any temporary transfer of power as politically damaging to an incumbent president. More recent experiences suggest that counsels have been moderately successful in impressing the need for prior arrangements between presidents and their vice‐presidents on matters of incapacitation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Since the ratification of the Twenty‐Fifth Amendment in 1967, presidents have been advised by White House counsels on how and when to apply the sections that address temporary vacancies in the office of the president and transfers of power during such times. Early experience with presidential illness and incapacitation under the amendment during the Reagan administration indicated that counsels recognized the constitutional and practical purposes of these provisions, but encountered opposition from presidents and political advisers who viewed any temporary transfer of power as politically damaging to an incumbent president. More recent experiences suggest that counsels have been moderately successful in impressing the need for prior arrangements between presidents and their vice‐presidents on matters of incapacitation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Since the ratification of the Twenty‐Fifth Amendment in 1967, presidents have been advised by White House counsels on how and when to apply the sections that address temporary vacancies in the office of the president and transfers of power during such times. Early experience with presidential illness and incapacitation under the amendment during the Reagan administration indicated that counsels recognized the constitutional and practical purposes of these provisions, but encountered opposition from presidents and political advisers who viewed any temporary transfer of power as politically damaging to an incumbent president. More recent experiences suggest that counsels have been moderately successful in impressing the need for prior arrangements between presidents and their vice‐presidents on matters of incapacitation.

Key concepts: Presidential system, Ratification, Law, Political science, Opposition (politics), Politics, Constitutional amendment, Administration (probate law)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Law: When Law and Politics Collide: Presidents and the Use of the Twenty‐Fifth Amendment — Research Paper | ScholarLens