The Law: When Law and Politics Collide: Presidents and the Use of the Twenty‐Fifth Amendment
Nancy Kassop
Abstract
Nancy Kassop
Abstract
Since the ratification of the Twenty‐Fifth Amendment in 1967, presidents have been advised by White House counsels on how and when to apply the sections that address temporary vacancies in the office of the president and transfers of power during such times. Early experience with presidential illness and incapacitation under the amendment during the Reagan administration indicated that counsels recognized the constitutional and practical purposes of these provisions, but encountered opposition from presidents and political advisers who viewed any temporary transfer of power as politically damaging to an incumbent president. More recent experiences suggest that counsels have been moderately successful in impressing the need for prior arrangements between presidents and their vice‐presidents on matters of incapacitation.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Since the ratification of the Twenty‐Fifth Amendment in 1967, presidents have been advised by White House counsels on how and when to apply the sections that address temporary vacancies in the office of the president and transfers of power during such times. Early experience with presidential illness and incapacitation under the amendment during the Reagan administration indicated that counsels recognized the constitutional and practical purposes of these provisions, but encountered opposition from presidents and political advisers who viewed any temporary transfer of power as politically damaging to an incumbent president. More recent experiences suggest that counsels have been moderately successful in impressing the need for prior arrangements between presidents and their vice‐presidents on matters of incapacitation.
Key concepts: Presidential system, Ratification, Law, Political science, Opposition (politics), Politics, Constitutional amendment, Administration (probate law)