2012Ergodic Theory and Dynamical SystemsOpen access

Helicity of vector fields preserving a regular contact form and topologically conjugate smooth dynamical systems

Stefan G. Müller, Peter Spaeth

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

Abstract We compute the helicity of a vector field preserving a regular contact form on a closed three-dimensional manifold, and improve results of Gambaudo and Ghys [Enlacements asymptotiques. Topology 36(6) (1997), 1355–1379] relating the helicity of the suspension of a surface isotopy to the Calabi invariant of the isotopy. Based on these results, we provide positive answers to two questions posed by Arnold in [The asymptotic Hopf invariant and its applications. Selecta Math. Soviet. 5(4) (1986), 327–345]. In the presence of a regular contact form that is also preserved, the helicity extends to an invariant of an isotopy of volume-preserving homeomorphisms, and is invariant under conjugation by volume-preserving homeomorphisms. A similar statement also holds for suspensions of surface isotopies and surface diffeomorphisms. This requires the techniques of topological Hamiltonian and contact dynamics developed by Banyaga and Spaeth [On the uniqueness of generating Hamiltonians for topological strictly contact isotopies.Preprint, 2012], Buhovsky and Seyfaddini [Uniqueness of generating Hamiltonians for continuous Hamiltonian flows. J. Symplectic Geom. to appear, arXiv:1003.2612v2], Müller [The group of Hamiltonian homeomorphisms in the $L^\infty $ -norm. J. Korean Math. Soc.45(6) (2008), 1769–1784], Müller and Oh [The group of Hamiltonian homeomorphisms and $C^0$ -symplectic topology. J. Symplectic Geom. 5(2) (2007), 167–219], Müller and Spaeth [Topological contact dynamics I: symplectization and applications of the energy-capacity inequality.Preprint, 2011, arXiv:1110.6705v2] and Viterbo [On the uniqueness of generating Hamiltonian for continuous limits of Hamiltonians flows. Int. Math. Res. Not. (2006), 34028; Erratum,Int. Math. Res. Not.(2006), 38748]. Moreover, we generalize an example of Furstenberg [Strict ergodicity and transformation of the torus. Amer. J. Math. 83(1961), 573–601] on topologically conjugate but not $C^1$ -conjugate area-preserving diffeomorphisms of the two-torus to trivial $T^2$ -bundles, and construct examples of Hamiltonian and contact vector fields that are topologically conjugate but not $C^1$ -conjugate. Higher-dimensional helicities are considered briefly at the end of the paper.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract We compute the helicity of a vector field preserving a regular contact form on a closed three-dimensional manifold, and improve results of Gambaudo and Ghys [Enlacements asymptotiques. Topology 36(6) (1997), 1355–1379] relating the helicity of the suspension of a surface isotopy to the Calabi invariant of the isotopy. Based on these results, we provide positive answers to two questions posed by Arnold in [The asymptotic Hopf invariant and its applications. Selecta Math. Soviet. 5(4) (1986), 327–345]. In the presence of a regular contact form that is also preserved, the helicity extends to an invariant of an isotopy of volume-preserving homeomorphisms, and is invariant under conjugation by volume-preserving homeomorphisms. A similar statement also holds for suspensions of surface isotopies and surface diffeomorphisms. This requires the techniques of topological Hamiltonian and contact dynamics developed by Banyaga and Spaeth [On the uniqueness of generating Hamiltonians for topological strictly contact isotopies.Preprint, 2012], Buhovsky and Seyfaddini [Uniqueness of generating Hamiltonians for continuous Hamiltonian flows. J. Symplectic Geom. to appear, arXiv:1003.2612v2], Müller [The group of Hamiltonian homeomorphisms in the $L^\infty $ -norm. J. Korean Math. Soc.45(6) (2008), 1769–1784], Müller and Oh [The group of Hamiltonian homeomorphisms and $C^0$ -symplectic topology. J. Symplectic Geom. 5(2) (2007), 167–219], Müller and Spaeth [Topological contact dynamics I: symplectization and applications of the energy-capacity inequality.Preprint, 2011, arXiv:1110.6705v2] and Viterbo [On the uniqueness of generating Hamiltonian for continuous limits of Hamiltonians flows. Int. Math. Res. Not. (2006), 34028; Erratum,Int. Math. Res. Not.(2006), 38748]. Moreover, we generalize an example of Furstenberg [Strict ergodicity and transformation of the torus. Amer. J. Math. 83(1961), 573–601] on topologically conjugate but not $C^1$ -conjugate area-preserving diffeomorphisms of the two-torus to trivial $T^2$ -bundles, and construct examples of Hamiltonian and contact vector fields that are topologically conjugate but not $C^1$ -conjugate. Higher-dimensional helicities are considered briefly at the end of the paper.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract We compute the helicity of a vector field preserving a regular contact form on a closed three-dimensional manifold, and improve results of Gambaudo and Ghys [Enlacements asymptotiques. Topology 36(6) (1997), 1355–1379] relating the helicity of the suspension of a surface isotopy to the Calabi invariant of the isotopy. Based on these results, we provide positive answers to two questions posed by Arnold in [The asymptotic Hopf invariant and its applications. Selecta Math. Soviet. 5(4) (1986), 327–345]. In the presence of a regular contact form that is also preserved, the helicity extends to an invariant of an isotopy of volume-preserving homeomorphisms, and is invariant under conjugation by volume-preserving homeomorphisms. A similar statement also holds for suspensions of surface isotopies and surface diffeomorphisms. This requires the techniques of topological Hamiltonian and contact dynamics developed by Banyaga and Spaeth [On the uniqueness of generating Hamiltonians for topological strictly contact isotopies.Preprint, 2012], Buhovsky and Seyfaddini [Uniqueness of generating Hamiltonians for continuous Hamiltonian flows. J. Symplectic Geom. to appear, arXiv:1003.2612v2], Müller [The group of Hamiltonian homeomorphisms in the $L^\infty $ -norm. J. Korean Math. Soc.45(6) (2008), 1769–1784], Müller and Oh [The group of Hamiltonian homeomorphisms and $C^0$ -symplectic topology. J. Symplectic Geom. 5(2) (2007), 167–219], Müller and Spaeth [Topological contact dynamics I: symplectization and applications of the energy-capacity inequality.Preprint, 2011, arXiv:1110.6705v2] and Viterbo [On the uniqueness of generating Hamiltonian for continuous limits of Hamiltonians flows. Int. Math. Res. Not. (2006), 34028; Erratum,Int. Math. Res. Not.(2006), 38748]. Moreover, we generalize an example of Furstenberg [Strict ergodicity and transformation of the torus. Amer. J. Math. 83(1961), 573–601] on topologically conjugate but not $C^1$ -conjugate area-preserving diffeomorphisms of the two-torus to trivial $T^2$ -bundles, and construct examples of Hamiltonian and contact vector fields that are topologically conjugate but not $C^1$ -conjugate. Higher-dimensional helicities are considered briefly at the end of the paper.

Key concepts: Isotopy, Topological conjugacy, Helicity, Invariant (physics), Vector field, Mathematics, Pure mathematics, Conjugate

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Helicity of vector fields preserving a regular contact form and topologically conjugate smooth dynamical systems — Research Paper | ScholarLens