2011•PubMedRequires access

Her2 amplification status in Iranian breast cancer patients: comparison of immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH).

Saeed Reza Ghaffari, Tayebeh Sabokbar, Jila Dastan, Maryam Rafati, Shirin Moossavi

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Her2/neu is a biomarker which is amplified and/or overexpressed in a subset of breast cancer patients who are eligible to receive trastuzumab. Her-2 gene amplification analysed by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and/or protein over-expression detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) are the two main methods used to detect Her-2 status in clinical practice. The concordance rate between the two techniques is controversial. METHODS: FISH analysis were performed on 104 tumoural samples from breast cancer patients with known IHC results to determine the Her2 gene status. The FISH/IHC analyses results were then compared and the concordance rate was determined. RESULTS: Her2 gene amplification was detected in 0 of IHC score 1+, 24/86 (27.91%) 2+, and 8/13 (61.54%) 3+. The IHC and FISH results concordance rates were 100%, 27.9%, and 61.5% for IHC scores of 1+, 2+, and 3+ respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that IHC 1+ should be considered as negative while IHC 2+ results need further confirmative analysis by FISH. Further quality control and standardization of IHC technique are required to improve the concordance rate between the two methods.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

INTRODUCTION: Her2/neu is a biomarker which is amplified and/or overexpressed in a subset of breast cancer patients who are eligible to receive trastuzumab. Her-2 gene amplification analysed by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and/or protein over-expression detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) are the two main methods used to detect Her-2 status in clinical practice. The concordance rate between the two techniques is controversial. METHODS: FISH analysis were performed on 104 tumoural samples from breast cancer patients with known IHC results to determine the Her2 gene status. The FISH/IHC analyses results were then compared and the concordance rate was determined. RESULTS: Her2 gene amplification was detected in 0 of IHC score 1+, 24/86 (27.91%) 2+, and 8/13 (61.54%) 3+. The IHC and FISH results concordance rates were 100%, 27.9%, and 61.5% for IHC scores of 1+, 2+, and 3+ respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that IHC 1+ should be considered as negative while IHC 2+ results need further confirmative analysis by FISH. Further quality control and standardization of IHC technique are required to improve the concordance rate between the two methods.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

INTRODUCTION: Her2/neu is a biomarker which is amplified and/or overexpressed in a subset of breast cancer patients who are eligible to receive trastuzumab. Her-2 gene amplification analysed by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and/or protein over-expression detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) are the two main methods used to detect Her-2 status in clinical practice. The concordance rate between the two techniques is controversial. METHODS: FISH analysis were performed on 104 tumoural samples from breast cancer patients with known IHC results to determine the Her2 gene status. The FISH/IHC analyses results were then compared and the concordance rate was determined. RESULTS: Her2 gene amplification was detected in 0 of IHC score 1+, 24/86 (27.91%) 2+, and 8/13 (61.54%) 3+. The IHC and FISH results concordance rates were 100%, 27.9%, and 61.5% for IHC scores of 1+, 2+, and 3+ respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that IHC 1+ should be considered as negative while IHC 2+ results need further confirmative analysis by FISH. Further quality control and standardization of IHC technique are required to improve the concordance rate between the two methods.

Key concepts: Immunohistochemistry, Concordance, Breast cancer, Fluorescence in situ hybridization, Fish <Actinopterygii>, Trastuzumab, Medicine, In situ hybridisation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Her2 amplification status in Iranian breast cancer patients: comparison of immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). — Research Paper | ScholarLens