1998World EnglishesRequires access

The Poet’s language: Foregrounding in Edwin Thumboo’s gods can die;

Jonathan J. Webster

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

The poetry of Edwin Thumboo has contributed much to the shaping and definition of Singapore’s English Language poetic canon. In this paper, I explore Thumboo’s esthetic use of consistent foregrounding in the poem gods can die from three perspectives: propositional, textual and interpersonal. Foregrounding refers to the usage of certain linguistic devices for the purpose of attracting attention. In poetry, meaning and esthetic effect are unified through the poet’s deliberate and systematic foregrounding of linguistic devices. Juxtaposed against the backgrounds of the standard language and an often rich and diverse poetic canon, the poet asserts his individuality through the systematic foregrounding of relations between the functional semantic components that together comprise the poem as semiotic object. The approach adopted here is functional‐semantic in orientation and based on earlier work carried out by the Prague School and more recently by Michael’A. Halliday and Ruqaiya Hasan. While it may be argued that the totality of the poet’s message is unlikely to be ever fully captured by even the most careful and detailed linguistic analysis, nevertheless this should not prevent one from attempting to explore the linguistic intricacy of the poet’s handiwork. For from such analysis, we gain an even better appreciation of the texture and meaning of the poem.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The poetry of Edwin Thumboo has contributed much to the shaping and definition of Singapore’s English Language poetic canon. In this paper, I explore Thumboo’s esthetic use of consistent foregrounding in the poem gods can die from three perspectives: propositional, textual and interpersonal. Foregrounding refers to the usage of certain linguistic devices for the purpose of attracting attention. In poetry, meaning and esthetic effect are unified through the poet’s deliberate and systematic foregrounding of linguistic devices. Juxtaposed against the backgrounds of the standard language and an often rich and diverse poetic canon, the poet asserts his individuality through the systematic foregrounding of relations between the functional semantic components that together comprise the poem as semiotic object. The approach adopted here is functional‐semantic in orientation and based on earlier work carried out by the Prague School and more recently by Michael’A. Halliday and Ruqaiya Hasan. While it may be argued that the totality of the poet’s message is unlikely to be ever fully captured by even the most careful and detailed linguistic analysis, nevertheless this should not prevent one from attempting to explore the linguistic intricacy of the poet’s handiwork. For from such analysis, we gain an even better appreciation of the texture and meaning of the poem.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The poetry of Edwin Thumboo has contributed much to the shaping and definition of Singapore’s English Language poetic canon. In this paper, I explore Thumboo’s esthetic use of consistent foregrounding in the poem gods can die from three perspectives: propositional, textual and interpersonal. Foregrounding refers to the usage of certain linguistic devices for the purpose of attracting attention. In poetry, meaning and esthetic effect are unified through the poet’s deliberate and systematic foregrounding of linguistic devices. Juxtaposed against the backgrounds of the standard language and an often rich and diverse poetic canon, the poet asserts his individuality through the systematic foregrounding of relations between the functional semantic components that together comprise the poem as semiotic object. The approach adopted here is functional‐semantic in orientation and based on earlier work carried out by the Prague School and more recently by Michael’A. Halliday and Ruqaiya Hasan. While it may be argued that the totality of the poet’s message is unlikely to be ever fully captured by even the most careful and detailed linguistic analysis, nevertheless this should not prevent one from attempting to explore the linguistic intricacy of the poet’s handiwork. For from such analysis, we gain an even better appreciation of the texture and meaning of the poem.

Key concepts: Foregrounding, Poetry, Meaning (existential), Linguistics, Literature, Sociology, Art, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Poet’s language: Foregrounding in Edwin Thumboo’s gods can die; — Research Paper | ScholarLens