2010•North American Journal of Fisheries ManagementRequires access

Capture Efficiency of Blue Catfish Electrofishing and the Effects of Temperature, Habitat, and Reservoir Location on Electrofishing-Derived Length Structure Indices and Relative Abundance

Kristopher A. Bodine, Daniel E. Shoup

Open publisher page 37 citations

Abstract

Abstract Current sampling methods for blue catfish Ictalurus furcatus are suspected of being strongly biased against preferred-length fish (≥762 mm in total length [TL]), making it difficult to accurately determine the species' population density and size structure. To understand this potential bias with respect to electrofishing, we conducted seasonal and habitat-specific sampling on three Oklahoma reservoirs using 15-pulse/s DC at the 100–1,000 V setting (the percent of range being adjusted to achieve 4-A output). Temperature, habitat, and reservoir section were analyzed to determine which variables were associated with the highest total catch per unit effort (CPUETotal), the CPUE of preferred-length blue catfish (CPUE762), and the relative stock density of preferred-length fish (RSD762). Total CPUE and CPUE762 were significantly higher when the water temperature was 18°C or more, but the variability increased as the temperature exceeded 28°C. Catch rates were significantly higher in the upper reservoir section for all length-groups, and no differences in CPUETotal were detected among habitats (channels, points, or flats). Both CPUE762 and RSD762 were highest in channel habitats, but the high variability and low catch rates of these larger fish limit the utility of habitat-specific sampling based on these findings. Additionally, we evaluated the capture efficiency of electrofishing by creating a population with a known length-frequency distribution. This population was sampled on three separate dates to determine which length-groups were more vulnerable to electrofishing. No significant differences in catch rate were detected among the length-groups, and the mean total catch from each sample was always less than 10% of the total population. Our results indicate that low-frequency electrofishing is not size selective and provides representative samples of blue catfish between 200 and 1,000 mm TL. We recommend that sampling be conducted at temperatures between 18°C and 28°C and that standard sampling protocols adopt a stratified design that incorporates reservoir section.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Current sampling methods for blue catfish Ictalurus furcatus are suspected of being strongly biased against preferred-length fish (≥762 mm in total length [TL]), making it difficult to accurately determine the species' population density and size structure. To understand this potential bias with respect to electrofishing, we conducted seasonal and habitat-specific sampling on three Oklahoma reservoirs using 15-pulse/s DC at the 100–1,000 V setting (the percent of range being adjusted to achieve 4-A output). Temperature, habitat, and reservoir section were analyzed to determine which variables were associated with the highest total catch per unit effort (CPUETotal), the CPUE of preferred-length blue catfish (CPUE762), and the relative stock density of preferred-length fish (RSD762). Total CPUE and CPUE762 were significantly higher when the water temperature was 18°C or more, but the variability increased as the temperature exceeded 28°C. Catch rates were significantly higher in the upper reservoir section for all length-groups, and no differences in CPUETotal were detected among habitats (channels, points, or flats). Both CPUE762 and RSD762 were highest in channel habitats, but the high variability and low catch rates of these larger fish limit the utility of habitat-specific sampling based on these findings. Additionally, we evaluated the capture efficiency of electrofishing by creating a population with a known length-frequency distribution. This population was sampled on three separate dates to determine which length-groups were more vulnerable to electrofishing. No significant differences in catch rate were detected among the length-groups, and the mean total catch from each sample was always less than 10% of the total population. Our results indicate that low-frequency electrofishing is not size selective and provides representative samples of blue catfish between 200 and 1,000 mm TL. We recommend that sampling be conducted at temperatures between 18°C and 28°C and that standard sampling protocols adopt a stratified design that incorporates reservoir section.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 37 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Current sampling methods for blue catfish Ictalurus furcatus are suspected of being strongly biased against preferred-length fish (≥762 mm in total length [TL]), making it difficult to accurately determine the species' population density and size structure. To understand this potential bias with respect to electrofishing, we conducted seasonal and habitat-specific sampling on three Oklahoma reservoirs using 15-pulse/s DC at the 100–1,000 V setting (the percent of range being adjusted to achieve 4-A output). Temperature, habitat, and reservoir section were analyzed to determine which variables were associated with the highest total catch per unit effort (CPUETotal), the CPUE of preferred-length blue catfish (CPUE762), and the relative stock density of preferred-length fish (RSD762). Total CPUE and CPUE762 were significantly higher when the water temperature was 18°C or more, but the variability increased as the temperature exceeded 28°C. Catch rates were significantly higher in the upper reservoir section for all length-groups, and no differences in CPUETotal were detected among habitats (channels, points, or flats). Both CPUE762 and RSD762 were highest in channel habitats, but the high variability and low catch rates of these larger fish limit the utility of habitat-specific sampling based on these findings. Additionally, we evaluated the capture efficiency of electrofishing by creating a population with a known length-frequency distribution. This population was sampled on three separate dates to determine which length-groups were more vulnerable to electrofishing. No significant differences in catch rate were detected among the length-groups, and the mean total catch from each sample was always less than 10% of the total population. Our results indicate that low-frequency electrofishing is not size selective and provides representative samples of blue catfish between 200 and 1,000 mm TL. We recommend that sampling be conducted at temperatures between 18°C and 28°C and that standard sampling protocols adopt a stratified design that incorporates reservoir section.

Key concepts: Electrofishing, Catch per unit effort, Catfish, Ictalurus, Fishery, Habitat, Environmental science, Sampling (signal processing)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Capture Efficiency of Blue Catfish Electrofishing and the Effects of Temperature, Habitat, and Reservoir Location on Electrofishing-Derived Length Structure Indices and Relative Abundance — Research Paper | ScholarLens