2008Forum for Social EconomicsRequires access

Comment on “What is Heterodox Economics? Conversations with Historians of Economic Thought”

D. Marshall Meador

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

The Comment on Wrenn’s article “What is Heterodox Economics?” suggests that the inability of heterodox economists to define their field arises from an as yet unrecognized and different metaphysical foundation than that of orthodox economics.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Comment on Wrenn’s article “What is Heterodox Economics?” suggests that the inability of heterodox economists to define their field arises from an as yet unrecognized and different metaphysical foundation than that of orthodox economics.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Comment on Wrenn’s article “What is Heterodox Economics?” suggests that the inability of heterodox economists to define their field arises from an as yet unrecognized and different metaphysical foundation than that of orthodox economics.

Key concepts: Positive economics, Economics, Neoclassical economics, Heterodox economics, Social policy, Schools of economic thought, Sociology, Mainstream economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comment on “What is Heterodox Economics? Conversations with Historians of Economic Thought” — Research Paper | ScholarLens