Comparison of QoS Performance between IPv6 QoS Management Model and IntServ and DiffServ QoS Models
El-Bahlul Fgee, J.D. Kenney, William Phillips, William Robertson, S. Sivakumar
Abstract
El-Bahlul Fgee, J.D. Kenney, William Phillips, William Robertson, S. Sivakumar
Abstract
An increasing number of emerging Internet applications require better than best effort quality of service (QoS) that is offered by the current Internet. Applications such as voice over IP (VoIP), video on demand (VoD) and e-commerce applications need end-to-end QoS guarantees defined in terms of throughput, delay and loss rate E. Kumsierek et al., (2002). However, QoS guarantee for these services require adding QoS algorithms that perform a number of resource management functions such as admission control, resource reservation and traffic monitoring. These functions can significantly increase the complexity and affect the scalability of the network. In this paper, three QoS schemes, integrated services (IntServ) P.P White (1997), differentiated services (DiffServ) S.Balck et al., (1998) and IPv6 QoS management, are compared with respect to QoS guarantee requirements. Also, the scalability and complexity issues are discussed for each one of them. The IPv6 QoS management model performs well during the simulation. It is also simple and scalable when it is implemented.
OpenAlex reports 23 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
An increasing number of emerging Internet applications require better than best effort quality of service (QoS) that is offered by the current Internet. Applications such as voice over IP (VoIP), video on demand (VoD) and e-commerce applications need end-to-end QoS guarantees defined in terms of throughput, delay and loss rate E. Kumsierek et al., (2002). However, QoS guarantee for these services require adding QoS algorithms that perform a number of resource management functions such as admission control, resource reservation and traffic monitoring. These functions can significantly increase the complexity and affect the scalability of the network. In this paper, three QoS schemes, integrated services (IntServ) P.P White (1997), differentiated services (DiffServ) S.Balck et al., (1998) and IPv6 QoS management, are compared with respect to QoS guarantee requirements. Also, the scalability and complexity issues are discussed for each one of them. The IPv6 QoS management model performs well during the simulation. It is also simple and scalable when it is implemented.
Key concepts: Quality of service, Computer science, Computer network, Scalability, Mobile QoS, Integrated services, Differentiated services, Voice over IP