2005Unpublished venueRequires access

Comparison of QoS Performance between IPv6 QoS Management Model and IntServ and DiffServ QoS Models

El-Bahlul Fgee, J.D. Kenney, William Phillips, William Robertson, S. Sivakumar

Open publisher page 23 citations

Abstract

An increasing number of emerging Internet applications require better than best effort quality of service (QoS) that is offered by the current Internet. Applications such as voice over IP (VoIP), video on demand (VoD) and e-commerce applications need end-to-end QoS guarantees defined in terms of throughput, delay and loss rate E. Kumsierek et al., (2002). However, QoS guarantee for these services require adding QoS algorithms that perform a number of resource management functions such as admission control, resource reservation and traffic monitoring. These functions can significantly increase the complexity and affect the scalability of the network. In this paper, three QoS schemes, integrated services (IntServ) P.P White (1997), differentiated services (DiffServ) S.Balck et al., (1998) and IPv6 QoS management, are compared with respect to QoS guarantee requirements. Also, the scalability and complexity issues are discussed for each one of them. The IPv6 QoS management model performs well during the simulation. It is also simple and scalable when it is implemented.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An increasing number of emerging Internet applications require better than best effort quality of service (QoS) that is offered by the current Internet. Applications such as voice over IP (VoIP), video on demand (VoD) and e-commerce applications need end-to-end QoS guarantees defined in terms of throughput, delay and loss rate E. Kumsierek et al., (2002). However, QoS guarantee for these services require adding QoS algorithms that perform a number of resource management functions such as admission control, resource reservation and traffic monitoring. These functions can significantly increase the complexity and affect the scalability of the network. In this paper, three QoS schemes, integrated services (IntServ) P.P White (1997), differentiated services (DiffServ) S.Balck et al., (1998) and IPv6 QoS management, are compared with respect to QoS guarantee requirements. Also, the scalability and complexity issues are discussed for each one of them. The IPv6 QoS management model performs well during the simulation. It is also simple and scalable when it is implemented.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 23 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

An increasing number of emerging Internet applications require better than best effort quality of service (QoS) that is offered by the current Internet. Applications such as voice over IP (VoIP), video on demand (VoD) and e-commerce applications need end-to-end QoS guarantees defined in terms of throughput, delay and loss rate E. Kumsierek et al., (2002). However, QoS guarantee for these services require adding QoS algorithms that perform a number of resource management functions such as admission control, resource reservation and traffic monitoring. These functions can significantly increase the complexity and affect the scalability of the network. In this paper, three QoS schemes, integrated services (IntServ) P.P White (1997), differentiated services (DiffServ) S.Balck et al., (1998) and IPv6 QoS management, are compared with respect to QoS guarantee requirements. Also, the scalability and complexity issues are discussed for each one of them. The IPv6 QoS management model performs well during the simulation. It is also simple and scalable when it is implemented.

Key concepts: Quality of service, Computer science, Computer network, Scalability, Mobile QoS, Integrated services, Differentiated services, Voice over IP

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of QoS Performance between IPv6 QoS Management Model and IntServ and DiffServ QoS Models — Research Paper | ScholarLens