The formal consequences of using variables in CCG categories
Beryl Hoffman
Abstract
Open-access reader
Beryl Hoffman
Abstract
Open-access reader
Combinatory Categorial Grammars, CCGs, (Steedman 1985) have been shown by Weir and Joshi (1988) to generate the same class of languages as Tree-Adjoining Grammars (TAG), Head Grammars (HG), and Linear Indexed Grammars (LIG). In this paper, I will discuss the effect of using variables in lexical category assignments in CCGs. It will be shown that using variables in lexical categories can increase the weak generative capacity of CCGs beyond the class of grammars listed above.
OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Combinatory Categorial Grammars, CCGs, (Steedman 1985) have been shown by Weir and Joshi (1988) to generate the same class of languages as Tree-Adjoining Grammars (TAG), Head Grammars (HG), and Linear Indexed Grammars (LIG). In this paper, I will discuss the effect of using variables in lexical category assignments in CCGs. It will be shown that using variables in lexical categories can increase the weak generative capacity of CCGs beyond the class of grammars listed above.
Key concepts: Indexed grammar, Rule-based machine translation, Tree-adjoining grammar, Phrase structure grammar, Combinatory categorial grammar, Computer science, Context-sensitive grammar, L-attributed grammar