‘Health and well-being’: Questioning the use of health concepts in public health policy and practice
Elaine Cameron, Jonathan M. Mathers, Jayne M. Parry
Abstract
Elaine Cameron, Jonathan M. Mathers, Jayne M. Parry
Abstract
In recent years, health and well-being have been ‘mainstreamed’ as a policy issue and have become the concern of a widening range of agencies. Simultaneously, increasing weight has been placed on the measurement of population health status, the implementation of evidence-based practice in public health and the more effective evaluation of policy interventions targeted at health gain and health inequalities. Thus, at a time when greater conceptual clarity is crucial, there are more stakeholders in ‘health’, each with a potentially different perspective and understanding of what ‘health’ is. In this study, we explore the need for greater conceptual clarity in relation to health, using the term ‘well-being’ as an exemplar. We draw on findings from a research project undertaken with community and professional groups in the Black Country and Shropshire that explored shared ways to measure aspects, and determinants, of health. We suggest a lack of attention to health concepts and their clarification, as indicated by the use of ‘well-being’ as an ill-defined tag to health, is having a negative impact on public health's ability to deliver health gain, and that commitment to clarifying concepts would lead to a range of benefits. At present, however, the term ‘well-being’ muddies the waters, acting more as an open-ended catch-all category than a clearly considered component of ‘health’.
OpenAlex reports 48 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In recent years, health and well-being have been ‘mainstreamed’ as a policy issue and have become the concern of a widening range of agencies. Simultaneously, increasing weight has been placed on the measurement of population health status, the implementation of evidence-based practice in public health and the more effective evaluation of policy interventions targeted at health gain and health inequalities. Thus, at a time when greater conceptual clarity is crucial, there are more stakeholders in ‘health’, each with a potentially different perspective and understanding of what ‘health’ is. In this study, we explore the need for greater conceptual clarity in relation to health, using the term ‘well-being’ as an exemplar. We draw on findings from a research project undertaken with community and professional groups in the Black Country and Shropshire that explored shared ways to measure aspects, and determinants, of health. We suggest a lack of attention to health concepts and their clarification, as indicated by the use of ‘well-being’ as an ill-defined tag to health, is having a negative impact on public health's ability to deliver health gain, and that commitment to clarifying concepts would lead to a range of benefits. At present, however, the term ‘well-being’ muddies the waters, acting more as an open-ended catch-all category than a clearly considered component of ‘health’.
Key concepts: CLARITY, Public health, Population health, Health policy, Health promotion, Public relations, Health belief model, International health