2007•IEEE Power Engineering Society General MeetingOpen access

Options to address EU ETS induced increases in power prices and windfall profits

Jos Sijm

Open full text 11 citations

Abstract

Since the official start of the EU emissions trading scheme (ETS) on January 1, 2005, electricity prices in several EU Member States have increased rapidly. Some have argued that these price increases are predominantly due to the passing through of the (opportunity) costs of freely allocated CO2emission allowances to the power sector, resulting in significant additional (windfall) profits for this sector. In some countries, this has resulted in a lively debate in which both politicians and major power-intensive users have suggested that the EU ETS induced increases in power prices and windfall profits should be addressed by means of adequate policy measures. The major purpose of the paper is to analyse a variety of options to address EU ETS induced increases in power prices and windfall profits, notably whether these options are effective and whether they have other (adverse) effects as well.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Since the official start of the EU emissions trading scheme (ETS) on January 1, 2005, electricity prices in several EU Member States have increased rapidly. Some have argued that these price increases are predominantly due to the passing through of the (opportunity) costs of freely allocated CO2emission allowances to the power sector, resulting in significant additional (windfall) profits for this sector. In some countries, this has resulted in a lively debate in which both politicians and major power-intensive users have suggested that the EU ETS induced increases in power prices and windfall profits should be addressed by means of adequate policy measures. The major purpose of the paper is to analyse a variety of options to address EU ETS induced increases in power prices and windfall profits, notably whether these options are effective and whether they have other (adverse) effects as well.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Since the official start of the EU emissions trading scheme (ETS) on January 1, 2005, electricity prices in several EU Member States have increased rapidly. Some have argued that these price increases are predominantly due to the passing through of the (opportunity) costs of freely allocated CO2emission allowances to the power sector, resulting in significant additional (windfall) profits for this sector. In some countries, this has resulted in a lively debate in which both politicians and major power-intensive users have suggested that the EU ETS induced increases in power prices and windfall profits should be addressed by means of adequate policy measures. The major purpose of the paper is to analyse a variety of options to address EU ETS induced increases in power prices and windfall profits, notably whether these options are effective and whether they have other (adverse) effects as well.

Key concepts: Windfall gain, Emissions trading, Economics, Variety (cybernetics), Power (physics), Monetary economics, Electricity, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Options to address EU ETS induced increases in power prices and windfall profits — Research Paper | ScholarLens