2013•Journal of Korean Academy of NursingRequires access

Validity of Instrument Development Research in Korean Nursing Research

Kyung‐Hee Lee, Sujin Shin

Abstract

PURPOSE: This integrative review study was done to analyze methods used for validation studies in Korean nursing research. METHODS: In this study, the literature on instrument development in nursing research from Research Information Sharing Service (RISS) and major nursing journal databases in Korea were examined. The MeSH search terms included 'nursing', 'instrument', 'instrument development', 'validation' and 189 articles were included in the review. RESULTS: The most frequently reported validity type was content validity, followed by construct validity, and criterion validity. One third reported a single type of validity, and 15% of the studies demonstrated three kinds of validity at the same time. In about 40% of the studies, both content and construct validity were examined. CONCLUSION: The results of the study indicate that it is necessary to provide a wider variety of evidence to establish whether instruments are valid enough to use in nursing research.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 53 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Key concepts: Construct validity, Content validity, Construct (python library), External validity, Psychology, Criterion validity, Nursing research, Nursing