2001Journal of Rehabilitation MedicineOpen access

COMPARISON OF TWO PHYSICAL EXERCISE PROGRAMS FOR THE EARLY INTERVENTION OF PAIN IN THE NECK, SHOULDERS AND LOWER BACK IN FEMALE HOSPITAL STAFF

Line Merethe Oldervoll, Mcmorris Ro, J.‐A. Zwart, Sven Svebak

Open full text 64 citations

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of increased aerobic capacity versus muscle strength rehabilitation of female hospital staff with long-lasting musculoskeletal back pain. Seventy-nine women agreed to participate in the intervention study. After a medical examination, 65 individuals were assigned to one of three balanced groups: Endurance training (aerobic capacity promoting training: ET: n = 22), strength promotion exercise (SP: n = 24) or a control group (CON: n = 19). The active groups met twice a week for 60 minutes of exercise over 15 weeks. Aerobic capacity (VO2max) and musculoskeletal pain were measured immediately before (T1) and after the intervention period (T2). Aerobic capacity significantly increased in the ET group, whereas no change was observed in the SP group, and a significant reduction was found in the CON group from T1 to T2. Musculoskeletal pain was significantly reduced in both intervention groups, whereas minor changes were observed in the control group. Results from a 7-month follow-up (T3) survey confirmed the beneficial effects of interventions on musculoskeletal pain. In conclusion, improved aerobic capacity appeared not to be a necessary mechanism in musculoskeletal back pain reduction.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of increased aerobic capacity versus muscle strength rehabilitation of female hospital staff with long-lasting musculoskeletal back pain. Seventy-nine women agreed to participate in the intervention study. After a medical examination, 65 individuals were assigned to one of three balanced groups: Endurance training (aerobic capacity promoting training: ET: n = 22), strength promotion exercise (SP: n = 24) or a control group (CON: n = 19). The active groups met twice a week for 60 minutes of exercise over 15 weeks. Aerobic capacity (VO2max) and musculoskeletal pain were measured immediately before (T1) and after the intervention period (T2). Aerobic capacity significantly increased in the ET group, whereas no change was observed in the SP group, and a significant reduction was found in the CON group from T1 to T2. Musculoskeletal pain was significantly reduced in both intervention groups, whereas minor changes were observed in the control group. Results from a 7-month follow-up (T3) survey confirmed the beneficial effects of interventions on musculoskeletal pain. In conclusion, improved aerobic capacity appeared not to be a necessary mechanism in musculoskeletal back pain reduction.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 64 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of increased aerobic capacity versus muscle strength rehabilitation of female hospital staff with long-lasting musculoskeletal back pain. Seventy-nine women agreed to participate in the intervention study. After a medical examination, 65 individuals were assigned to one of three balanced groups: Endurance training (aerobic capacity promoting training: ET: n = 22), strength promotion exercise (SP: n = 24) or a control group (CON: n = 19). The active groups met twice a week for 60 minutes of exercise over 15 weeks. Aerobic capacity (VO2max) and musculoskeletal pain were measured immediately before (T1) and after the intervention period (T2). Aerobic capacity significantly increased in the ET group, whereas no change was observed in the SP group, and a significant reduction was found in the CON group from T1 to T2. Musculoskeletal pain was significantly reduced in both intervention groups, whereas minor changes were observed in the control group. Results from a 7-month follow-up (T3) survey confirmed the beneficial effects of interventions on musculoskeletal pain. In conclusion, improved aerobic capacity appeared not to be a necessary mechanism in musculoskeletal back pain reduction.

Key concepts: Medicine, Shoulders, Physical therapy, Aerobic capacity, Rehabilitation, Aerobic exercise, Psychological intervention, Intervention (counseling)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
COMPARISON OF TWO PHYSICAL EXERCISE PROGRAMS FOR THE EARLY INTERVENTION OF PAIN IN THE NECK, SHOULDERS AND LOWER BACK IN FEMALE HOSPITAL STAFF — Research Paper | ScholarLens