Landscape of clustering algorithms
Anil K. Jain, Er Topchy, Martin H. C. Law, Joachim M. Buhmann
Abstract
Anil K. Jain, Er Topchy, Martin H. C. Law, Joachim M. Buhmann
Abstract
Numerous clustering algorithms, their taxonomies and evaluation studies are available in the literature. Despite the diversity of different clustering algorithms, solutions delivered by these algorithms exhibit many commonalities. An analysis of the similarity and properties of clustering objective functions is necessary from the operational/user perspective. We revisit conventional categorization of clustering algorithms and attempt to relate them according to the partitions they produce. We empirically study the similarity of clustering solutions obtained by many traditional as well as relatively recent clustering algorithms on a number of real-world data sets. Sammon’s mapping and a complete-link clustering of the inter-clustering dissimilarity values are performed to detect a meaningful grouping of the objective functions. We find that only a small number of clustering algorithms are sufficient to represent a large spectrum of clustering criteria. For example, interesting groups of clustering algorithms are centered around the graph partitioning, linkage-based and Gaussian mixture model based algorithms. 1.
OpenAlex reports 87 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Numerous clustering algorithms, their taxonomies and evaluation studies are available in the literature. Despite the diversity of different clustering algorithms, solutions delivered by these algorithms exhibit many commonalities. An analysis of the similarity and properties of clustering objective functions is necessary from the operational/user perspective. We revisit conventional categorization of clustering algorithms and attempt to relate them according to the partitions they produce. We empirically study the similarity of clustering solutions obtained by many traditional as well as relatively recent clustering algorithms on a number of real-world data sets. Sammon’s mapping and a complete-link clustering of the inter-clustering dissimilarity values are performed to detect a meaningful grouping of the objective functions. We find that only a small number of clustering algorithms are sufficient to represent a large spectrum of clustering criteria. For example, interesting groups of clustering algorithms are centered around the graph partitioning, linkage-based and Gaussian mixture model based algorithms. 1.
Key concepts: Cluster analysis, Correlation clustering, CURE data clustering algorithm, Single-linkage clustering, Canopy clustering algorithm, Fuzzy clustering, Computer science, Consensus clustering