2004•Unpublished venueRequires access

Landscape of clustering algorithms

Anil K. Jain, Er Topchy, Martin H. C. Law, Joachim M. Buhmann

Open publisher page 87 citations

Abstract

Numerous clustering algorithms, their taxonomies and evaluation studies are available in the literature. Despite the diversity of different clustering algorithms, solutions delivered by these algorithms exhibit many commonalities. An analysis of the similarity and properties of clustering objective functions is necessary from the operational/user perspective. We revisit conventional categorization of clustering algorithms and attempt to relate them according to the partitions they produce. We empirically study the similarity of clustering solutions obtained by many traditional as well as relatively recent clustering algorithms on a number of real-world data sets. Sammon’s mapping and a complete-link clustering of the inter-clustering dissimilarity values are performed to detect a meaningful grouping of the objective functions. We find that only a small number of clustering algorithms are sufficient to represent a large spectrum of clustering criteria. For example, interesting groups of clustering algorithms are centered around the graph partitioning, linkage-based and Gaussian mixture model based algorithms. 1.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Numerous clustering algorithms, their taxonomies and evaluation studies are available in the literature. Despite the diversity of different clustering algorithms, solutions delivered by these algorithms exhibit many commonalities. An analysis of the similarity and properties of clustering objective functions is necessary from the operational/user perspective. We revisit conventional categorization of clustering algorithms and attempt to relate them according to the partitions they produce. We empirically study the similarity of clustering solutions obtained by many traditional as well as relatively recent clustering algorithms on a number of real-world data sets. Sammon’s mapping and a complete-link clustering of the inter-clustering dissimilarity values are performed to detect a meaningful grouping of the objective functions. We find that only a small number of clustering algorithms are sufficient to represent a large spectrum of clustering criteria. For example, interesting groups of clustering algorithms are centered around the graph partitioning, linkage-based and Gaussian mixture model based algorithms. 1.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 87 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Numerous clustering algorithms, their taxonomies and evaluation studies are available in the literature. Despite the diversity of different clustering algorithms, solutions delivered by these algorithms exhibit many commonalities. An analysis of the similarity and properties of clustering objective functions is necessary from the operational/user perspective. We revisit conventional categorization of clustering algorithms and attempt to relate them according to the partitions they produce. We empirically study the similarity of clustering solutions obtained by many traditional as well as relatively recent clustering algorithms on a number of real-world data sets. Sammon’s mapping and a complete-link clustering of the inter-clustering dissimilarity values are performed to detect a meaningful grouping of the objective functions. We find that only a small number of clustering algorithms are sufficient to represent a large spectrum of clustering criteria. For example, interesting groups of clustering algorithms are centered around the graph partitioning, linkage-based and Gaussian mixture model based algorithms. 1.

Key concepts: Cluster analysis, Correlation clustering, CURE data clustering algorithm, Single-linkage clustering, Canopy clustering algorithm, Fuzzy clustering, Computer science, Consensus clustering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Landscape of clustering algorithms — Research Paper | ScholarLens