2006•Employee RelationsRequires access

Does excellence have a gender?

Marieke van den Brink, M.L.M. Brouns, Sietske Waslander

Open publisher page 81 citations

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this research is to show that upward mobility of female academics in regular selection procedures is evolving extremely slowly, especially in The Netherlands. This paper aims at a more profound understanding of professorial recruitment and selection procedures in relation to gender differences at Dutch universities. Design/methodology/approach This paper explores the recruitment of university professors as a gendered process and is mainly based on the analysis of selection committee reports between 1999‐2003 from six large Dutch universities (n=682). Findings The research findings give a clear indication of gender differences in selection and recruitment procedures. Although not in all disciplines, the paper observes a disparity in the percentages of male and female applicants who were successful in the selection procedure. There is no confirmation of the predicted relationship with the nature of the procedure (open/closed), but there is a correlation with the number of women on the committee. Research limitations/implications As it was not possible to make any pronouncements about the quality of the applicants, a strict measurement of gender bias is not possible. Practical implications The results show that academic disciplines are gendered in a different way, requiring different measures at the institutional and individual levels. Originality/value This is the first paper on recruitment and selection procedures that takes into account disciplinary differences and factors such as the number of applicants for each professorship and the recruitment potential by gender.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose The purpose of this research is to show that upward mobility of female academics in regular selection procedures is evolving extremely slowly, especially in The Netherlands. This paper aims at a more profound understanding of professorial recruitment and selection procedures in relation to gender differences at Dutch universities. Design/methodology/approach This paper explores the recruitment of university professors as a gendered process and is mainly based on the analysis of selection committee reports between 1999‐2003 from six large Dutch universities (n=682). Findings The research findings give a clear indication of gender differences in selection and recruitment procedures. Although not in all disciplines, the paper observes a disparity in the percentages of male and female applicants who were successful in the selection procedure. There is no confirmation of the predicted relationship with the nature of the procedure (open/closed), but there is a correlation with the number of women on the committee. Research limitations/implications As it was not possible to make any pronouncements about the quality of the applicants, a strict measurement of gender bias is not possible. Practical implications The results show that academic disciplines are gendered in a different way, requiring different measures at the institutional and individual levels. Originality/value This is the first paper on recruitment and selection procedures that takes into account disciplinary differences and factors such as the number of applicants for each professorship and the recruitment potential by gender.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 81 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose The purpose of this research is to show that upward mobility of female academics in regular selection procedures is evolving extremely slowly, especially in The Netherlands. This paper aims at a more profound understanding of professorial recruitment and selection procedures in relation to gender differences at Dutch universities. Design/methodology/approach This paper explores the recruitment of university professors as a gendered process and is mainly based on the analysis of selection committee reports between 1999‐2003 from six large Dutch universities (n=682). Findings The research findings give a clear indication of gender differences in selection and recruitment procedures. Although not in all disciplines, the paper observes a disparity in the percentages of male and female applicants who were successful in the selection procedure. There is no confirmation of the predicted relationship with the nature of the procedure (open/closed), but there is a correlation with the number of women on the committee. Research limitations/implications As it was not possible to make any pronouncements about the quality of the applicants, a strict measurement of gender bias is not possible. Practical implications The results show that academic disciplines are gendered in a different way, requiring different measures at the institutional and individual levels. Originality/value This is the first paper on recruitment and selection procedures that takes into account disciplinary differences and factors such as the number of applicants for each professorship and the recruitment potential by gender.

Key concepts: Originality, Excellence, Selection (genetic algorithm), Discipline, Value (mathematics), Quality (philosophy), Gender bias, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Does excellence have a gender? — Research Paper | ScholarLens