1997Occupational and Environmental MedicineOpen access

Use of screening nerve conduction studies for predicting future carpal tunnel syndrome.

R A Werner, Alfred Franzblau, James W. Albers, H Büchele, T. Armstrong

Open full text 77 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if an abnormal sensory nerve conduction study consistent with median mononeuropathy in asymptomatic workers was predictive of future complaints of the hand or finger suggestive of carpal tunnel syndrome. METHODS: This was a case-control study of over 700 active workers at five different work sites: four sites involved manufacturing workers and one site represented clerical workers. Patients' reports of symptoms of pain, numbness, tingling, or burning in the hand or finger that lasted more than one week or occurred three or more times after the initial screening were investigated. 77 cases were defined as asymptomatic workers with electrodiagnostic findings of median mononeuropathy in either hand based on a comparison of median and ulnar sensory evoked peak latencies. A difference > or = 0.5 ms was defined as abnormal; a normal difference was < or = 0.2 ms. Controls were asymptomatic age, and sex matched workers with normal nerve conduction studies in both hands. Follow up questionnaires were completed 17 (SD 6) months later. RESULTS: The follow up participation rate was 72%. Cases had a 12% risk of developing symptoms during the follow up period compared with 10% in the control group, chi 2 = 0.12, P = 0.73. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal median sensory nerve conduction studies in asymptomatic workers were not predictive of future hand or fingers complaints and if used for preplacement screening among active workers this should be done with caution.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To determine if an abnormal sensory nerve conduction study consistent with median mononeuropathy in asymptomatic workers was predictive of future complaints of the hand or finger suggestive of carpal tunnel syndrome. METHODS: This was a case-control study of over 700 active workers at five different work sites: four sites involved manufacturing workers and one site represented clerical workers. Patients' reports of symptoms of pain, numbness, tingling, or burning in the hand or finger that lasted more than one week or occurred three or more times after the initial screening were investigated. 77 cases were defined as asymptomatic workers with electrodiagnostic findings of median mononeuropathy in either hand based on a comparison of median and ulnar sensory evoked peak latencies. A difference > or = 0.5 ms was defined as abnormal; a normal difference was < or = 0.2 ms. Controls were asymptomatic age, and sex matched workers with normal nerve conduction studies in both hands. Follow up questionnaires were completed 17 (SD 6) months later. RESULTS: The follow up participation rate was 72%. Cases had a 12% risk of developing symptoms during the follow up period compared with 10% in the control group, chi 2 = 0.12, P = 0.73. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal median sensory nerve conduction studies in asymptomatic workers were not predictive of future hand or fingers complaints and if used for preplacement screening among active workers this should be done with caution.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 77 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if an abnormal sensory nerve conduction study consistent with median mononeuropathy in asymptomatic workers was predictive of future complaints of the hand or finger suggestive of carpal tunnel syndrome. METHODS: This was a case-control study of over 700 active workers at five different work sites: four sites involved manufacturing workers and one site represented clerical workers. Patients' reports of symptoms of pain, numbness, tingling, or burning in the hand or finger that lasted more than one week or occurred three or more times after the initial screening were investigated. 77 cases were defined as asymptomatic workers with electrodiagnostic findings of median mononeuropathy in either hand based on a comparison of median and ulnar sensory evoked peak latencies. A difference > or = 0.5 ms was defined as abnormal; a normal difference was < or = 0.2 ms. Controls were asymptomatic age, and sex matched workers with normal nerve conduction studies in both hands. Follow up questionnaires were completed 17 (SD 6) months later. RESULTS: The follow up participation rate was 72%. Cases had a 12% risk of developing symptoms during the follow up period compared with 10% in the control group, chi 2 = 0.12, P = 0.73. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal median sensory nerve conduction studies in asymptomatic workers were not predictive of future hand or fingers complaints and if used for preplacement screening among active workers this should be done with caution.

Key concepts: Mononeuropathy, Asymptomatic, Carpal tunnel syndrome, Medicine, Median nerve, Nerve conduction, Nerve conduction study, Carpal tunnel

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Use of screening nerve conduction studies for predicting future carpal tunnel syndrome. — Research Paper | ScholarLens